找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Understanding and Investigating Response Processes in Validation Research; Bruno D. Zumbo,Anita M. Hubley Book 2017 Springer International

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 53590|回復(fù): 68
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:07:56 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Understanding and Investigating Response Processes in Validation Research
編輯Bruno D. Zumbo,Anita M. Hubley
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/942/941735/941735.mp4
概述Introduces novel forms of response processes evidence.Provides examples of how to design and report response processes evidence.Serves as an invaluable resource for researchers conducting validation w
叢書名稱Social Indicators Research Series
圖書封面Titlebook: Understanding and Investigating Response Processes in Validation Research;  Bruno D. Zumbo,Anita M. Hubley Book 2017 Springer International
描述.This volume addresses an urgent need across multiple disciplines to broaden our understanding and use of response processes evidence of test validity. It builds on the themes and findings of the volume Validity and Validation in Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences (Zumbo & Chan, 2014), with a focus on measurement validity evidence based on response processes. Approximately 1000 studies are published each year examining the validity of inferences made from tests and measures in the social, behavioural, and health sciences. The widely accepted Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (1999, 2014) present five sources of evidence for validity: content-related, response processes, internal structure, relationships with other variables, and consequences of testing. Many studies focus on internal structure and relationships with other variables sources of evidence, which have a long history in validation research, known methodologies, and numerous exemplars in the literature. Far less is understood by test users and researchers conducting validation work about how to think about and apply new and emerging sources of validity evidence. This groundbreaking volume is the fir
出版日期Book 2017
關(guān)鍵詞Changing technology online surveys; Models of response processes; Psychometric methods for examining r
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56129-5
isbn_softcover978-3-319-85833-3
isbn_ebook978-3-319-56129-5Series ISSN 1387-6570 Series E-ISSN 2215-0099
issn_series 1387-6570
copyrightSpringer International Publishing AG 2017
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Understanding and Investigating Response Processes in Validation Research影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Understanding and Investigating Response Processes in Validation Research影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Understanding and Investigating Response Processes in Validation Research網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Understanding and Investigating Response Processes in Validation Research網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Understanding and Investigating Response Processes in Validation Research被引頻次




書目名稱Understanding and Investigating Response Processes in Validation Research被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Understanding and Investigating Response Processes in Validation Research年度引用




書目名稱Understanding and Investigating Response Processes in Validation Research年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Understanding and Investigating Response Processes in Validation Research讀者反饋




書目名稱Understanding and Investigating Response Processes in Validation Research讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:22:28 | 只看該作者
Bruno D. Zumbo,Yan Liu,Amery D. Wu,Barry Forer,Benjamin R. Shear
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:26:46 | 只看該作者
Understanding and Investigating Response Processes in Validation Research
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:33:52 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:10:32 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:52:34 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:50:50 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:59:42 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 02:14:39 | 只看該作者
Validating a Distractor-Driven Geometry Test Using a Generalized Diagnostic Classification Model,can be used to validate intended score uses and guide future test development. The discussion considers both the strengths and limitations of applying the GDCM framework to this type of distractor-driven test.
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:51:33 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-5 12:49
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
博客| 理塘县| 海门市| 淅川县| 平远县| 西昌市| 改则县| 深圳市| 新丰县| 天峻县| 邛崃市| 大新县| 平泉县| 日喀则市| 连城县| 交城县| 班玛县| 武鸣县| 汝城县| 张家港市| 临江市| 榆中县| 清流县| 苍溪县| 格尔木市| 太原市| 封开县| 台南县| 日照市| 南召县| 明溪县| 芦山县| 镇雄县| 曲麻莱县| 隆子县| 大丰市| 玉山县| 益阳市| 武冈市| 胶州市| 太原市|