Titlebook: Understanding Editorial Text: A Computer Model of Argument Comprehension; Sergio J. Alvarado Book 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990 arg

famine

Recognizing Argument Structures,rotection. Furthermore, it was established that the conceptual representation for this type of editorials forms an argument graph in which configurations of support and attack relationships among beliefs are organized by instances of argument units (AUs). This chapter examines another interrelated i

BOLUS

EXCEL

Annotated Example of the OpEd System, of this approach, argument comprehension in OpEd is not considered as an isolated task but rather as an integral aspect of language comprehension. As such, OpEd’s process model involves the use of techniques for mapping input editorial text into an argument graph that represents and maintains the c

V洗浴

Servile

Memory Search and Retrieval,hension, and answer generation is performed by a recursive-descent, English generator. This chapter examines the techniques used in the process of retrieving information from conceptual representations of editorials.

isotope

Customary

Recognizing Argument Structures,ons of support and attack relationships among beliefs are organized by instances of argument units (AUs). This chapter examines another interrelated issue addressed within the context of OpEd, namely: how the components of an editorial’s argument graph are recognized from the editorial text.

CAMP

Adrenal-Glands

笨拙處理

Argument Units, are not instances of single attack or support relationships, but rather configurations of such relationships. Those configurations allow editorial writers to: (1) show awareness of their opponents’ beliefs; (2) contradict their opponent’s beliefs; and (3) provide justifications for their own beliefs.