Titlebook: Understanding Cultural Non-Participation in an Egalitarian Context; Riie Heikkil? Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2022 The Author(s) 2022 cultural capital.So

使醉

書目名稱Understanding Cultural Non-Participation in an Egalitarian Context影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Understanding Cultural Non-Participation in an Egalitarian Context影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Understanding Cultural Non-Participation in an Egalitarian Context網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Understanding Cultural Non-Participation in an Egalitarian Context網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Understanding Cultural Non-Participation in an Egalitarian Context被引頻次




書目名稱Understanding Cultural Non-Participation in an Egalitarian Context被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Understanding Cultural Non-Participation in an Egalitarian Context年度引用




書目名稱Understanding Cultural Non-Participation in an Egalitarian Context年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Understanding Cultural Non-Participation in an Egalitarian Context讀者反饋




書目名稱Understanding Cultural Non-Participation in an Egalitarian Context讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Apogee

Contextualising Cultural Participationa positional good and as a vehicle of social exclusion. The chapter then introduces some of the main contributions arguing that the highbrow-oriented culture could be losing its distinctive value—most importantly, the discussions on the ‘rise of the omnivore’ and the ‘meltdown scenario’. This chapte

Override

What Do We Know About Cultural Participation and Non-participation?ation across different national contexts are discussed. It is argued in the light of other empirical studies that the operationalisations are often far from solid and tend to depart from highbrow-oriented participation. This means that many forms of more mundane participation often remain invisible

Pantry

Defining the Research Objectrticipation appears as something that belongs to the territory of the popular and working classes, which further devalues cultural non-participation. Furthermore, this chapter explains in detail the research design and introduces the data set (40 individual interviews and 9 focus groups) and the sam

Ascribe

dissent

大吃大喝

Resistancepposition to the norm of highbrow-oriented cultural participation. Most methodological challenges of the interviews are especially related to this discourse. The boundaries drawn in the resistance discourse are basically all directed upwards. They are either aesthetical (directed against highbrow-or

seruting

Conclusionticipation (in highbrow-oriented activities) is only in some cases ‘compensated’ by informal social of kin-based participation. Rather, there are generally very active people and people who mostly engage in everyday pursuits. Third, the three main categories of talking about cultural non-participati

陳列

Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2022lore the most salient lifestyles and symbolic boundaries drawn in these potentially disengaged groups.The book departs from a theoretical framework in which cultural practices and cultural participation in their most visible and tangible form are seen as manifestations of cultural capital and power,

SPALL

2661-8699 up interviews.Adds nuance to many contemporary and classicalThis open access book uses a rich data set, from individuals whose background profiles statistically predict strong cultural non-participation, to explore the most salient lifestyles and symbolic boundaries drawn in these potentially diseng