Titlebook: Unconformities in Shakespeare’s History Plays; Kristian Smidt Book 1982 Kristian Smidt 1982 history.history of literature.play.William Sha

鳴叫大步走

書目名稱Unconformities in Shakespeare’s History Plays影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Unconformities in Shakespeare’s History Plays影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Unconformities in Shakespeare’s History Plays網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Unconformities in Shakespeare’s History Plays網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Unconformities in Shakespeare’s History Plays被引頻次




書目名稱Unconformities in Shakespeare’s History Plays被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Unconformities in Shakespeare’s History Plays年度引用




書目名稱Unconformities in Shakespeare’s History Plays年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Unconformities in Shakespeare’s History Plays讀者反饋




書目名稱Unconformities in Shakespeare’s History Plays讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

MIRE

妨礙議事

Shakespeare at Work,ing the more confident re-handling. He may have borrowed feathers from Greene and his fellow wits but would be unlikely to lift passages verbatim from their plays. He more probably salvaged lines from his juvenilia and threw away the worser part of them.

tenuous

RALES

Lipoma

Introduction,ed that ‘Whether you approach [this play] from the angle of the texture of the verse, the verse-styles, character, plot or theme, you encounter what geologists call “unconformities”.’. A similar term had already been employed by M. R. Ridley, commenting on theories of composite authorship in .: ‘a(chǎn)ny

走調(diào)

,The Whole Contention — One Play into Two,nd even their titles are sometimes misleading. Thus everything points to the likelihood that Shakespeare began his series of plays about English kings with what the Folio called .. This is a firmly plotted drama which has a natural sequel in . but which presupposes no antecedent history play and ind

Countermand

,Treachery and Dissension — Two Plays into One,ay: the war in France and the ‘jarrings’ in England. There is monumental disagreement, however, as to whether these components do, or do not, compose one play. Most modern scholars of repute, including Tillyard, Alexander, Price, Kirschbaum, Bullough, Brockbank, and Cairncross — a formidable enough

歹徒

,Plots and Prophecies — The Tragedy of King Richard the Third,l’ of all his plays.. In a sense it is a metadrama in which a self-styled villain conspires with the spectators to produce a black comedy and himself plays a variety of roles in order to deceive and discomfit the other members of the cast. This actor-villain speaks a total of 166 lines (i.e. about 4

無彈性

The Troublesome Theme of King John,ternal evidence to help us fix the date of composition of this play. For that matter it may have been the end-product of several stages of rewriting. In the absence of convincing proof for a very early dating (like that proposed by E. A. J. Honigmann in the new Arden edition) or a very late dating,