找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Uncertainty in Pharmacology; Epistemology, Method Adam LaCaze,Barbara Osimani Book 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 Drug Developmen

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 22788|回復(fù): 56
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:02:18 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Uncertainty in Pharmacology
副標(biāo)題Epistemology, Method
編輯Adam LaCaze,Barbara Osimani
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/942/941149/941149.mp4
概述Proposes various incentives to improve the pharmaceutical landscape.Analyses and solves methodological problems by drawing on epistemological tools.Refines and improves current approaches to evidence
叢書(shū)名稱(chēng)Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: Uncertainty in Pharmacology; Epistemology, Method Adam LaCaze,Barbara Osimani Book 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 Drug Developmen
描述.This volume covers a wide range of topics concerning methodological, epistemological, and regulatory-ethical issues around pharmacology. The book focuses in particular on the diverse sources of uncertainty, the different kinds of uncertainty that there are, and the diverse ways in which these uncertainties are (or could be) addressed. Compared with the more basic sciences, such as chemistry or biology, pharmacology works across diverse observable levels of reality: although the first step in the causal chain leading to the therapeutic outcome takes place at the biochemical level, the end-effect is a clinically observable result—which is influenced not only by biological actions, but also psychological and social phenomena. Issues of causality and evidence must be treated with these specific aspects in mind. In covering these issues, the book opens up a common domain of investigation which intersects the deeply intertwined dimensions of pharmacological research, pharmaceutical regulation and the related economic environment. The book is a collective endeavour with in-depth contributions from experts in pharmacology, philosophy of medicine, statistics, scientific methodology, formal
出版日期Book 2020
關(guān)鍵詞Drug Development; Drug Policy; Drug Safety; Clinical Trials; Risk Prevention; Pharmaceutical Market; Pharm
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29179-2
isbn_softcover978-3-030-29181-5
isbn_ebook978-3-030-29179-2Series ISSN 0068-0346 Series E-ISSN 2214-7942
issn_series 0068-0346
copyrightSpringer Nature Switzerland AG 2020
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Uncertainty in Pharmacology影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Uncertainty in Pharmacology影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Uncertainty in Pharmacology網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Uncertainty in Pharmacology網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Uncertainty in Pharmacology被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Uncertainty in Pharmacology被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Uncertainty in Pharmacology年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Uncertainty in Pharmacology年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Uncertainty in Pharmacology讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Uncertainty in Pharmacology讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶(hù)組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:14:59 | 只看該作者
Causal Insights from Failure: Post-marketing Risk Assessment of Drugs as a Way to Uncover Causal Mec to understand the causal mechanism underlying a certain outcome. Here, we base our argument on a particular philosophical framework, causal dispositionalism, which urges that causes should be understood as complex, intrinsic, tendential and context-sensitive. Applied to pharmacology, dispositionali
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:27:49 | 只看該作者
Extrapolating from Model Organisms in Pharmacologyategies of extrapolation: enumerative induction, comparative process tracing, phylogenetic reasoning, and robustness reasoning. We argue that evidence of mechanisms plays a crucial role in several strategies for extrapolation and in the underlying logic of extrapolation: the more directly a strategy
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:02:39 | 只看該作者
Mechanistic vs Statistical Extrapolation in Preclinical Research in Psychiatry: Challenging the Rece pathological states in organisms, thanks to a step by step comparison of causal pathways. . takes the form: . cause C brings out effect E in animal through causal pathway M, . M is similar in animals and humans, . therefore C will likely bring out E in humans. As the example of psychiatric research
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:03:41 | 只看該作者
Analogy-Based Inference Patterns in Pharmacological Researchwork for the purpose of formally exploring different analogy-based inference patterns with respect to their justification in pharmacological risk assessment. By relating formal explications of similarity, analogy, and analog simulation, three sources of confirmatory support for a causal hypothesis a
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:19:42 | 只看該作者
In Silico Clinical Trials: A Possible Response to Complexity in Pharmacologyreatment is administered make pharmacological research extremely difficult. Due to the inability to completely predict how a product will affect individual patients, it’s not unusual for a drug to show serious problems during clinical tests after having performed well in pre-clinical and laboratory
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:06:44 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:20:59 | 只看該作者
“Caught in the Amber”: A Sketch of Chemical Underdeterminationmature, on the other, the shift of the object range by introducing new substances can change the dispositional description of the phenomena one is aiming at. Mainstream philosophers of science sometimes discuss the former as what could be called “epistemological” underdetermination, whereas the latt
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:28:55 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:35:33 | 只看該作者
Learning by Difference: Placebo Effects and Specific Efficacy in Pharmacological RCTs trial arms. We label this the “assumption of specific efficacy”. There are a number of situations in which the assumption of specific efficacy does not hold. We describe the epistemic consequences that arise in these situations and discuss strategies for preserving the internal validity of randomiz
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-17 23:17
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
辉县市| 金平| 彝良县| 乌鲁木齐县| 河津市| 丰宁| 寿光市| 沂水县| 象山县| 卓资县| 四平市| 论坛| 宁陕县| 商城县| 三河市| 札达县| 上栗县| 通渭县| 青州市| 信阳市| 梓潼县| 海淀区| 徐水县| 白银市| 陆河县| 和田市| 郯城县| 文登市| 小金县| 台中市| 定远县| 莒南县| 枞阳县| 桃园市| 景洪市| 临漳县| 大连市| 驻马店市| 永德县| 石泉县| 麻江县|