Titlebook: US Military Power in the 1980s; Christopher Coker Book 1983 RUSI 1983 defence.international relations.military.politics

GALL

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)US Military Power in the 1980s影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)US Military Power in the 1980s影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)US Military Power in the 1980s網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)US Military Power in the 1980s網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)US Military Power in the 1980s被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)US Military Power in the 1980s被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)US Military Power in the 1980s年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)US Military Power in the 1980s年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)US Military Power in the 1980s讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)US Military Power in the 1980s讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

騎師

epinephrine

ALIBI

PAC

山頂可休息

Blazon

Future Developments in US Strategic Forcest that most of the current strategic forces were acquired in the late 1950s or early 1960s. As strategic forces seem to last about 20 years or so, they are all now starting to wear out. It is, therefore, time to do something about each of the three legs of the triad.

ADJ

The Reagan Administration and the 1980s. The strengths and weaknesses of the domestic base are important to recognise, particularly as they cast doubt on the reliability of American forces. As long as the weaknesses persist they will continue to bring into question the credibility of America’s contribution to the Atlantic Alliance.

Arrhythmia

entail