Titlebook: US Defense Budget Outcomes; Volatility and Predi Heidi Brockmann Demarest Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 Co

Communal

infatuation

Book 2017l budget request. Containing data and sources largely unavailable to researchers without access to the Department of Defense, the book should be of interest to anyone looking for a direct, current, and methodical analysis of defense budget outcomes that preserves the informal and nuanced mechanics of a political and complicated process.?.

electrolyte

Why the Defense Budget Is Worth Considering,the U.S. Army’s budget designated for program funding—or, the dollars used to purchase items such as trucks, rifles, and helicopters—this book elaborates on why weapon systems experience such volatile funding decisions by congressional committees while the overall Army and defense budgets differ onl

Focus-Words

,Congress Reviews the Army’s Budget,et request. Key individuals responsible for shepherding each program toward final funding in the national defense appropriations act are introduced, along with a typical array of factors and obstacles that shape budget outcomes. The chapter is intended to describe the congressional budget review pro

材料等

Hyperplasia

Uncovering Turmoil in Stable Budgets,f program funding requests during the budget review process each fiscal year. This is much different from what you might assume given evidence from both domestic and defense budgets over the past 25 years. Program funding is markedly non-incremental and is not confined to a particular or consistent

refine

拾落穗

Army Engagement with Congress,eeting a member of Congress to discuss a recent funding cut, a phone call between the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee and the Secretary of the Army about the import``ance of the Army’s modernization program, or a congressional staff visit to Picatinny Arsenal in New Jersey to fire a n

CRUE

A Bleak Outlook for Future Combat Systems,ressional engagement strategy on the part of senior Army leaders, the program’s funding fluctuated over multiple fiscal years and was eventually terminated due to its technological immaturity, its complex management scheme, and its failure to engender sustained congressional support. Interestingly,

細微的差異