| 書目名稱 | The Philosophy of Historical Case Studies |
| 編輯 | Tilman Sauer,Raphael Scholl |
| 視頻video | http://file.papertrans.cn/917/916336/916336.mp4 |
| 概述 | Deals with a pressing issue in history and philosophy of science.Discusses criteria for evaluating historical case studies.Advances the field of integrated history and philosophy of science.Includes s |
| 叢書名稱 | Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science |
| 圖書封面 |  |
| 描述 | This volume collects reflections on the role of philosophy in case studies in the history of science. Case studies have played a prominent role in recent history and philosophy of science. They have been used to illustrate, question, explore, or explicate philosophical points of view. Even if not explicitly so, historical narratives are always guided by philosophical background assumptions. But what happens if different philosophies lead to different narratives of the same historical episodes? Can historical case studies decide between competing philosophical viewpoints? What are the criteria that a case study has to fulfill in order to be philosophically relevant? Bringing together leading practitioners in the fields of history and philosophy of the physical and the life sciences, this volume addresses this methodological problem and proposes ways of rendering explicit philosophical assumptions of historical work. |
| 出版日期 | Book 2016 |
| 關(guān)鍵詞 | Case Studies in the History of Science; Historical Methodology; History of Science; Integrated History |
| 版次 | 1 |
| doi | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30229-4 |
| isbn_softcover | 978-3-319-80755-3 |
| isbn_ebook | 978-3-319-30229-4Series ISSN 0068-0346 Series E-ISSN 2214-7942 |
| issn_series | 0068-0346 |
| copyright | Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016 |
|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋|
派博傳思國(guó)際
( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328)
GMT+8, 2025-10-6 05:57
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:02:49
