找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: The Origins of the Idea of Scientific Progress; Bernard de Fontenell Daniel ?pelda Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 47433|回復(fù): 35
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:01:17 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)The Origins of the Idea of Scientific Progress
副標(biāo)題Bernard de Fontenell
編輯Daniel ?pelda
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/916/915413/915413.mp4
概述Introduces a new interpretation of the genesis of the idea of scientific progress in early modern science and philosophy.Revisits the discovery of the temporality of knowledge.Rectifies misunderstandi
叢書(shū)名稱(chēng)International Archives of the History of Ideas‘ Archives internationales d‘histoire des idées
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: The Origins of the Idea of Scientific Progress; Bernard de Fontenell Daniel ?pelda Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s
描述.This volume offers a new interpretation of the genesis of the idea of scientific progress in early modern science and philosophy. The interpretation argues that the idea of scientific progress was not a historical category, but an epistemological one. The main thesis of the book posits that the idea of scientific progress was a methodological means of dealing with the contingency of nature. To illustrate the novelty of the idea, the individual chapters compare several features of Renaissance natural philosophy with a new regime of knowledge that included time as an inevitable factor of empirical research. The temporal regime of knowledge is illustrated by the work of Bernard de Fontenelle and his colleagues at the Académie des sciences in Paris at the end of the 17th century. The new interpretation remedies a gap in recent scholarship where the idea of scientific progress has been overlooked even though the early modern natural philosophers themselves used it to describe the nature of their research. The book places both well-known texts and less-studied documents in a new light, thus contributing to the lively and rich debate on the origins and nature of early modern science and
出版日期Book 2024
關(guān)鍵詞Idea of Scientific Progress; Early Modern Science and Philosophy; Bernard de Fontenelle; Académie des S
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60526-0
isbn_softcover978-3-031-60528-4
isbn_ebook978-3-031-60526-0Series ISSN 0066-6610 Series E-ISSN 2215-0307
issn_series 0066-6610
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)The Origins of the Idea of Scientific Progress影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)The Origins of the Idea of Scientific Progress影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)The Origins of the Idea of Scientific Progress網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)The Origins of the Idea of Scientific Progress網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)The Origins of the Idea of Scientific Progress被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)The Origins of the Idea of Scientific Progress被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)The Origins of the Idea of Scientific Progress年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)The Origins of the Idea of Scientific Progress年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)The Origins of the Idea of Scientific Progress讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)The Origins of the Idea of Scientific Progress讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶(hù)組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:10:09 | 只看該作者
0066-6610 nature of their research. The book places both well-known texts and less-studied documents in a new light, thus contributing to the lively and rich debate on the origins and nature of early modern science and 978-3-031-60528-4978-3-031-60526-0Series ISSN 0066-6610 Series E-ISSN 2215-0307
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 04:06:16 | 只看該作者
Daniel ?peldaIntroduces a new interpretation of the genesis of the idea of scientific progress in early modern science and philosophy.Revisits the discovery of the temporality of knowledge.Rectifies misunderstandi
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:49:41 | 只看該作者
International Archives of the History of Ideas‘ Archives internationales d‘histoire des idéeshttp://image.papertrans.cn/t/image/915413.jpg
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:47:04 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60526-0Idea of Scientific Progress; Early Modern Science and Philosophy; Bernard de Fontenelle; Académie des S
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 14:11:39 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:51:38 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:15:18 | 只看該作者
Book 2024argues that the idea of scientific progress was not a historical category, but an epistemological one. The main thesis of the book posits that the idea of scientific progress was a methodological means of dealing with the contingency of nature. To illustrate the novelty of the idea, the individual c
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:12:07 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:33:17 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-86964-8Erzbergbau; Erzlagerst?tte; Hüttenwesen; Keramik; Metall; Metallhandel; Werkstoff; mineral resources
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-20 23:42
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
开封县| 黑水县| 泗洪县| 伊宁市| 三江| 朝阳县| 巴青县| 南川市| 安西县| 武鸣县| 固原市| 桑植县| 吉林市| 兴义市| 左云县| 民勤县| 贵港市| 都江堰市| 固始县| 西乡县| 崇明县| 盐池县| 小金县| 溆浦县| 拜城县| 红河县| 山东| 那坡县| 潮安县| 竹北市| 鄂伦春自治旗| 北海市| 美姑县| 镇巴县| 贵港市| 淮安市| 鸡东县| 邵阳县| 福州市| 嵊泗县| 嘉兴市|