找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: The Autonomy Paradox: Teachers’ Perceptions of Self-Governance Across Europe; Wieland Wermke,Maija Salokangas Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 44322|回復(fù): 35
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:16:20 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱The Autonomy Paradox: Teachers’ Perceptions of Self-Governance Across Europe
編輯Wieland Wermke,Maija Salokangas
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/905/904836/904836.mp4
概述Offers an in-depth investigation into what constitutes a teacher’s work in four case study countries.Demonstrates the dire need for in-depth international comparative research.Provides useful tools fo
圖書封面Titlebook: The Autonomy Paradox: Teachers’ Perceptions of Self-Governance Across Europe;  Wieland Wermke,Maija Salokangas Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if
描述.What do we mean when we speak about teacher autonomy? How free are teachers to go about their work? ?..To answer these complex questions the authors asked thousands of teachers in four national contexts: in Finland, Ireland, Germany and Sweden, what they think autonomy looks like. The resulting book examines teacher autonomy theoretically?and empirically, comparing?teachers’?perceptions of their professional?autonomy.?Utilizing a mixed method approach the authors combine data from a large-scale questionnaire study, teacher interviews, lesson and meeting observations, and workshops that brought together teachers from the four participating countries.?All this engagement with teachers revealed that simply increasing their professional autonomy might not lead to desired?outcomes. This is because, from a teachers’ point of view,?increased decision-making capacity brings further complexity and risk to?their?work, and it may instead lead to anxiety, self-restriction,?and the eventual rejection of autonomy.?These surprising conclusions challenge the increasingly orthodox view that increased autonomy is a desirable end in itself.?This is what?the authors call the autonomy paradox..
出版日期Book 2021
關(guān)鍵詞Teacher Autonomy; Education Governance; Comparative Education; Education Policy; Teaching Profession
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65602-7
isbn_softcover978-3-030-65604-1
isbn_ebook978-3-030-65602-7
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱The Autonomy Paradox: Teachers’ Perceptions of Self-Governance Across Europe影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱The Autonomy Paradox: Teachers’ Perceptions of Self-Governance Across Europe影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱The Autonomy Paradox: Teachers’ Perceptions of Self-Governance Across Europe網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱The Autonomy Paradox: Teachers’ Perceptions of Self-Governance Across Europe網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱The Autonomy Paradox: Teachers’ Perceptions of Self-Governance Across Europe被引頻次




書目名稱The Autonomy Paradox: Teachers’ Perceptions of Self-Governance Across Europe被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱The Autonomy Paradox: Teachers’ Perceptions of Self-Governance Across Europe年度引用




書目名稱The Autonomy Paradox: Teachers’ Perceptions of Self-Governance Across Europe年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱The Autonomy Paradox: Teachers’ Perceptions of Self-Governance Across Europe讀者反饋




書目名稱The Autonomy Paradox: Teachers’ Perceptions of Self-Governance Across Europe讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:13:22 | 只看該作者
第104836主題貼--第2樓 (沙發(fā))
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:39:40 | 只看該作者
板凳
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:19:35 | 只看該作者
第4樓
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:33:36 | 只看該作者
5樓
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:04:07 | 只看該作者
6樓
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:23:10 | 只看該作者
7樓
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 00:47:48 | 只看該作者
8樓
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 02:41:14 | 只看該作者
9樓
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:05:30 | 只看該作者
10樓
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-19 11:49
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
鸡西市| 柞水县| 论坛| 孟州市| 贡嘎县| 崇州市| 大冶市| 宜阳县| 冀州市| 德昌县| 阳春市| 集安市| 双柏县| 公主岭市| 黔东| 台东县| 崇仁县| 鹿泉市| 鹤山市| 屏东市| 嘉定区| 甘谷县| 周宁县| 留坝县| 莆田市| 大足县| 福海县| 嘉定区| 定远县| 富宁县| 新宾| 玉山县| 南充市| 东城区| 凤城市| 宁国市| 秭归县| 四川省| 石首市| 东安县| 宣汉县|