Titlebook: Symbol and Interpretation; David M. Rasmussen Book 1974 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1974 Immanuel Kant.discourse.imagination.

門牙

書目名稱Symbol and Interpretation影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Symbol and Interpretation影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Symbol and Interpretation網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Symbol and Interpretation網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名




書目名稱Symbol and Interpretation被引頻次




書目名稱Symbol and Interpretation被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Symbol and Interpretation年度引用




書目名稱Symbol and Interpretation年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Symbol and Interpretation讀者反饋




書目名稱Symbol and Interpretation讀者反饋學科排名

導(dǎo)師

Toward a Theoretical Foundation for a Correlation between Literary and Religious Discourse,In the former chapters the symbol was considered as it appears in a mythic context. In this discussion the literary role of the symbol will be analyzed and a theoretical foundation for a correlation between literary and religious discourse will be offered.

garrulous

http://image.papertrans.cn/t/image/883806.jpg

厭煩

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1594-3Immanuel Kant; discourse; imagination; language; ontology; theory of language

時間等

茁壯成長

Mircea Eliade: Structural Hermeneutics and Philosophy,ly the problem of the religious symbol is discussed; later other types of symbols will be considered. The theoretical framework of the last chapter provides the foundation for the development of this hermeneutic orientation.

興奮過度

Introduction,. As one whose own philosophic speculations began at, the end of a cultural epoch under methodologies dominated either by neo-Kantianism or schools of logical empiricism the symbol as a product of a cultural imagination has been diminished; it has been necessary for those who wanted to preserve the

Kinetic

Symbol and Language,s precisely this context that language provides. Because the study of language can avoid neither the problematic of intended meanings implicit in the usage of language, nor the issue of the concretization of language articulated by a human subject, we shall examine the manner in which a phenomenolog

ERUPT

抱狗不敢前

Paul Ricoeur: The Anthropological Necessity of a Special Language, historical symbols may facilitate a similar renewal. The work of Paul Ricoeur can be conceived of as continuous with that of Mircea Eliade because it brings the threefold issue of the meaning of the symbol, a hermeneutic of the symbol, as well as the anthropological and linguistic consequences of t