Titlebook: Subjunctive Reasoning; John L. Pollock Book 1976 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1976 Enzo Paci.axiomatization.identity.journal.

可怖

書目名稱Subjunctive Reasoning影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Subjunctive Reasoning影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Subjunctive Reasoning網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Subjunctive Reasoning網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Subjunctive Reasoning被引頻次




書目名稱Subjunctive Reasoning被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Subjunctive Reasoning年度引用




書目名稱Subjunctive Reasoning年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Subjunctive Reasoning讀者反饋




書目名稱Subjunctive Reasoning讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

moribund

使習(xí)慣于

Four Kinds of Conditionals,ems will clarify the nature of these conditionals and thereby facilitate their analysis. The problem of analyzing subjunctive conditionals has been exacerbated by the fact that there are actually several different kinds of subjunctive conditionals, with different properties and correspondingly diffe

evasive

Subjunctive Generalizations, law says not just that all actual .’s are .’s, but that . a .. Statements of this latter form will be called subjunctive generalizations. They are to be contrasted with . which have the form ?.?. Our problem in this chapter is to understand subjunctive generalizations.

范圍廣

nutrients

TIGER

climax

Causes, by the very large number of verbs of causation in the language; e.g., to push, to bend, to corrode, to cut, to make, to ignite, to transport, to convince, to compel, to remind, to irritate, to influence, to create, to motivate, to stimulate, to incite, to mislead, to induce, to offend, to effect, t

表否定

Probabilities,e, exceptionless, laws. It may be that all putative laws are really just approximations to general probability statements. For example, this is the way much of quantum mechanics has gone. Should it come to pass that there really are no true general laws, then the counterfactual conditionals, necessi

卜聞

Book 1976eral and specific grounds. As becomes apparent from reading the notes, the book would not have been possible without their pioneering work on subjunctive conditionals. In addition, both were kind enough to provide specific comments on earlier versions of different parts of the book, and Stalnaker re