Titlebook: Subjectivation in Political Theory and Contemporary Practices; Andreas Oberprantacher,Andrei Siclodi Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicabl

Obscure

Mast-Cell

Disk199

Breaking out of the Cycle of Fear: Exodus Politicsmbly: the breaking of the cycles of fear. In this chapter, Hetzel explores the role of fear in the affective economy of subjectivation and indicates why and under which conditions the breaking of a cycle of fear may be regarded as a political event. For this purpose, Hetzel draws on concepts of an e

TSH582

玷污

Metropolitan Stasis@Real Democracy@Post-representative Hegemony: On the Sociology of ‘Social Non-Movns against itself. This is when the movements that keep it going and the connections that keep it alive are blocked, just to mobilize space and bodies as an immediate means of the acting assembly. While such assemblies may generate panic within established regimes of power, for those who are partici

倔強(qiáng)一點(diǎn)

From Mute Objects to Militant Subjects: The Politics of Rebellious Animalshumans) and phonic animals (nonhumans). In so doing, this discourse merely enables nonhumans to become mute objects of representation rather than subjects of speech, maintaining the exclusion of animals from the political community of speaking subjects. Eschewing moral approaches to the political pr

dapper

The Incorrigible Subject: The Autonomy of Migration and the US Immigration Stalemateon to another reality: the embodied materiality of ‘illegal’ migrants. These humble border crossers are the ‘incorrigible’ subject of virtually all contemporary border regimes. As autonomous subjects, with their own aspirations, needs, and desires, which necessarily exceed any regime of immigration

瑣事

OPINE

索賠

Deaths, Visibility, and the Politics of Dissensus at the US-Mexico Borderir attempt to cross the desert. Nienass and Délano argue that these politics of mourning are stagings of dissensus in Jacques Ranciere’s sense, as they place these border deaths in the context of state violence and constitute a challenge to existing frames within which we sense someone as publically grievable.