Titlebook: Studies in the Acquisition of Anaphora; Defining the Constra Barbara Lust Book 1986 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1986 Index.gr

lesion

Pastry

Crossover Between Acquisition Research and Government and Binding Theory: Comments on the Paper by Tl facts. First, compared to, say, fifteen years ago there has been a spectacular improvement in the quality and theoretical relevance of these studies over the past few years. Second, this type of acquisition research appears to remain extremely marginal within the field of developmental psycholingu

粗語

發(fā)芽

1873-0043 by individuals who are currently working, on probleJ,IlS in this area. The book includes two independent volumes. The major focus of these volumes is a psycholinguistic problem: the first language acquisition of anaphora. The volumes are intended to provide a basic reference source for the study of

慢跑

Crossover Between Acquisition Research and Government and Binding Theory: Comments on the Paper by Tfifteen years, a number of highly general structural principles have emerged which are more or less agreed upon and which constitute a fertile source for hypotheses that may be testable in acquisition research. As for the persisting marginal status of this type of research, I have no explanations, only regret.

ethereal

cavity

LAPSE

Center and Periphery in the Grammar of Anaphoraving pronouns) are those of intended-coreference with definite NP’s. While an alternative interpretation of pronouns as bound variables is known to exist, it is assumed to be a restricted LF phenomenon.

藥物

Book 1986uals who are currently working, on probleJ,IlS in this area. The book includes two independent volumes. The major focus of these volumes is a psycholinguistic problem: the first language acquisition of anaphora. The volumes are intended to provide a basic reference source for the study of this one c

Priapism

Fundamental Issues in the Theory of Bindingchieved by a rule “index NP”. Thus there is no special rule of coindexing or any special prohibition against coindexing by the basic indexing rule (see Freidin and Lasnik 1981 for discussion). This rule generates representations of sentences where lexical NPs are interpreted as coreferential as in (1–3).