Titlebook: Structural Linguistics and Human Communication; An Introduction into Bertil Malmberg Book 19631st edition Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

威風(fēng)

書目名稱Structural Linguistics and Human Communication影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Structural Linguistics and Human Communication影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Structural Linguistics and Human Communication網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Structural Linguistics and Human Communication網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Structural Linguistics and Human Communication被引頻次




書目名稱Structural Linguistics and Human Communication被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Structural Linguistics and Human Communication年度引用




書目名稱Structural Linguistics and Human Communication年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Structural Linguistics and Human Communication讀者反饋




書目名稱Structural Linguistics and Human Communication讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

灰心喪氣

Introduction,allel developments. It is consequently of no use arguing about the priority of one or the other. If we say that primitive man invented language or that the invention of language made some intelligent primate into man, we say the same thing. Man is a talking animal; no other animal talks. It will be

證實(shí)

品嘗你的人

不怕任性

BAIT

Segmentation. Forms of Expression. Oppositions and Distinctions. Paradigmatic Structures,he form in which it appears when registered for instance on an oscillograph film (Fig.14) — and the picture given by a sound spectrograph (Fig.47) on the basis of a formant analysis, show no more than an incessant variation of the different parameters mentioned in Chap. III. Even in cases where typi

極小

Redundancy and Relevancy. Levels of Abstraction,airs in opposition and pairs in contrast, following the type example that . is identical (structurally) with . except for one feature, the distinctive voice and that, consequently, . can be regarded as .+voice, etc.

compose

親屬

Syntagmatic Structures. Distribution and Probability,ue through its relations to the other units of the paradigm. Its amount of information is to a large extent determined thereby. The richer the system, the greater the amount of information of any of its units, and vice versa. But as a member of a given chain of expression units, i.e. in a syntagm, i

GNAW

Content Analysis,ts which, in exactly the same way as phonemes and prosodemes, have to be classified into paradigms of invariants. The procedure for establishing invariants is commutation. There is opposition between content invariants in the paradigm, and there is contrast between content units in the chain. Both t