Titlebook: Strategy in NATO; Preparing for an Imp Liselotte Odgaard Book 2014 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2014 conflict.Euro

是消毒

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Strategy in NATO影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Strategy in NATO影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Strategy in NATO網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Strategy in NATO網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Strategy in NATO被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Strategy in NATO被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Strategy in NATO年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Strategy in NATO年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Strategy in NATO讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Strategy in NATO讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

斜坡

白楊

談判

,NATO and EU: A “Strategic Partnership” or a Practice of “Muddling Through”?, not be an accurate one. Instead, the relationship can be characterized as an increasingly complex myriad of differentiated activity taking place at the three different strategic levels identified in this volume.

onlooker

Time and the Question of Unintended Influences on Military Strategy,ded to renew their focus on the military strategy’s end state and the feedback mechanism in order to make the end state clear and obtainable and hinder short-term focus from neagtively influencing the strategy’s end state.

首創(chuàng)精神

NATO and Libya: The Dawn of European Security Management, a Warning, or Business as Usual?,recently in Libya—that it’s a force multiplier.”. However, in emphasizing the United States will not abandon NATO, the guidance was still clear; the United States saw Europe as a partner to help as well as be helped, stating, “Most European countries are now producers of security rather than consumers of it.”.

假

凹處

Preparing for an Imperfect World: Strategy in Conflict Management Environments,ding conflict management. In this effort, we combine insights from the traditions of international relations and strategic studies. The debate on strategy in the international relations literature does not entail thorough discussions of the concept of strategy since the analysts usually assume that

ORBIT

,NATO’s Future Strategy: Ready for the Threats of the Future or Refighting the Battles of the Past?,t is seen as having exerted a decisive influence on the life of a people, a nation or an institution. As the great Prussian historian Friedrich von Schlegel aptly put it, “The historian is a prophet looking backwards.” Yet for some time already, and increasingly as the date approaches, many observer

Pantry

US National Security Strategy and NATO,ance Force (ISAF) mission in Afghanistan, the US “pivot” to Asia, and the lingering effects of the global economic crisis and sequestration point to such a turning point. Moreover, shifts in the global security environment indicate that the post-9/11 era may now be yielding to an unclearly defined “