Titlebook: Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics; John R. Searle,Ferenc Kiefer,Manfred Bierwisch Book 1980 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Hollan

疏忽

Situational Context and Illocutionary Force,e is more and more considered to be an instrument of interaction, after a long period of favouring the investigation of linguistic expressions used to describe facts in reality. Since language mainly was studied from the viewpoint of its descriptive function, the connection between language structur

incite

Mast-Cell

omnibus

The Background of Meaning,ng of words and sentences and the context of their utterance. The view I shall be challenging is sometimes put by saying that the meaning of a sentence is the meaning that it has independently of any context whatever — the meaning it has in the so-called ?null context“. The view I shall be espousing

有說服力

Illocutionary Logic and Self-Defeating Speech Acts,promises, orders, declarations…) that are performed by the utterance of sentences of natural or formal languages. The analytic philosophers (especially J. L. Austin and J. R. Searle) have shown the philosophical importance of a logical analysis of the forms of such speech acts. Illocutionary force i

步履蹣跚

喃喃而言

IVORY

Surface Compositionality and the Semantics of Mood,ruth values), I want to characterize the imperative and the interrogative mood by assigning suitable and natural kinds of possible denotations, which are a strictly compositional result of the characteristic syntax defining each mood.

缺乏

Situational Context and Illocutionary Force,e and conditions of communication has not been focussed on. Consequently, the nature of language has been viewed rather narrowly. In his criticism of Chomsky’s approach to linguistic theory Searle (1972) focussed attention on just this point.

Kidney-Failure