找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Solidarity in the European Union; A Fundamental Value Andreas Grimmel,Susanne My Giang Book 2017 Springer International Publishing AG 2017

[復制鏈接]
樓主: 劉興旺
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 10:06:23 | 只看該作者
es such as the refugee crisis, the Eurozone crisis, nationalThis volume approaches the current crisis of solidarity in the European Union from a multidisciplinary perspective. The contributions explore the concept of solidarity, its role in the European integration process, and analyze the risks ent
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 16:34:36 | 只看該作者
Solidarity as a Legal Conceptbased legal substantiations of solidarity within the EU and beyond; and, finally, to frame solidarity as a constitutional paradigm. In doing so, the paper follows a leitmotif once expressed by Jacques Delors in the saying “solidarity mechanisms are not based on pure generosity, but on enlightened self-interest”.
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 20:06:03 | 只看該作者
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 23:25:42 | 只看該作者
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 05:15:25 | 只看該作者
Introduction: Solidarity Lost? The European Union and the Crisis of One of Its Core Values,, the rise of nationalist parties, separatist movements and terrorist threats. What all these challenges share is the fact that they call for common solutions—and for solidarity. Many of these challenges even go beyond Europe and call for solidarity not just among Europeans but also with states and
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 10:29:30 | 只看該作者
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 14:16:12 | 只看該作者
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 18:30:57 | 只看該作者
Solidarity as a Legal Concept argues that a precise meaning of or conceptual framework for this notion is anything but clear. The question of which overall expectations, moral obligations, political assumptions and normative forces can be attributed to “solidarity” needs, therefore, to be addressed. Against this backdrop, the c
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 19:54:50 | 只看該作者
European Solidarity and Its Limits: Insights from Current Political Challengesty in the European multi-level system and develop a typology of four different forms of solidarity: transnational solidarity, supranational solidarity, intergovernmental solidarity and international solidarity. This contribution focuses on the type of intergovernmental solidarity between member stat
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 00:22:57 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-19 17:23
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
定远县| 北流市| 万源市| 洪洞县| 德令哈市| 青浦区| 汕头市| 津南区| 云南省| 金沙县| 湖南省| 葫芦岛市| 寿宁县| 澜沧| 全州县| 灵石县| 江津市| 通化市| 渭源县| 赣州市| 贡觉县| 顺义区| 团风县| 米林县| 彭水| 龙游县| 亚东县| 简阳市| 洛川县| 汉中市| 大新县| 泾川县| 清原| 磐石市| 乌兰浩特市| 福安市| 剑川县| 屯留县| 乌海市| 灵丘县| 南靖县|