Titlebook: Sociology in Brazil; A Brief Institutiona Veridiana Domingos Cordeiro,Hugo Neri Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s),

監(jiān)管

書目名稱Sociology in Brazil影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Sociology in Brazil影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Sociology in Brazil網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Sociology in Brazil網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Sociology in Brazil被引頻次




書目名稱Sociology in Brazil被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Sociology in Brazil年度引用




書目名稱Sociology in Brazil年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Sociology in Brazil讀者反饋




書目名稱Sociology in Brazil讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

昏迷狀態(tài)

青石板

Chagrin

腐敗

,1930s–1940s—Institutionalizing Sociology: The Settlement of an Academic and Scientific Environment,ning future leaders and bureaucrats. The social sciences were the chosen way. Prestigious foreign professors were hired from the United States and Europe to help in this endeavor. They brought with them different sociological traditions which marked the new institutions where they taught and researc

monopoly

,1950s–1960s: Sociology in a Golden Era of Consolidation,in the 1950s. At the heart of the scientific agenda were topics like national identity, the racial question, and economic development. Among other sociologists of that generation, Florestan Fernandes established sociology as a genuine scientific discipline. In doing this, he opposed both the previou

optional

Flustered

,1985–2000s: Rebuilding Sociology in the New Democracy,tive battle to reinsert Sociology into school curricula, which had became uncritical and conservative during the dictatorship. In academia, Sociology envisioned new paths and topics of work not related to the authoritarian reality. The density of new topics really meant a new shift in the discipline

MILK

Adornment

Conclusion,ion to a canon of sociological works. We also outline the perspective of sociology after the elections of 2018, when a far-right president won the elections ending two decades of left and center-left politics that fostered higher education and research.