Titlebook: Sociology in Austria since 1945; Christian Fleck Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 Sociology.Austria.universi

Autonomous

書目名稱Sociology in Austria since 1945影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Sociology in Austria since 1945影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Sociology in Austria since 1945網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Sociology in Austria since 1945網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Sociology in Austria since 1945被引頻次




書目名稱Sociology in Austria since 1945被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Sociology in Austria since 1945年度引用




書目名稱Sociology in Austria since 1945年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Sociology in Austria since 1945讀者反饋




書目名稱Sociology in Austria since 1945讀者反饋學科排名

coddle

原始

Sociology in Austria: Introduction,burg Empire, a tiny successor state had to struggle to survive, and government did not spend much attention to academic affairs. Two consecutive dictatorships destroyed academic freedom and brought with them forced migration and imprisonment. Favoritism and conformism became characteristic patterns

hemoglobin

assent

A Decade of Backwardness,d one has to recognize the broader situation in society and the universities. Due to consecutive regime changes conformism dominated the behavior of academics. Sociology could not prosper in the 1950s because the ministry did not like its Western appeal and former Austrians were not called back. In

Talkative

A Missed Opportunity,trian Paul F. Lazarsfeld who managed to persuade the Ford Foundation to give a grant for such an endeavor. However, the Austrians did not like this proposal and wasted four years quarreling about who should profit from the American gift. In 1963 an institute opened which is still around: the Institu

緊張過度

TAIN

dithiolethione

Extramural Social Research,uropean Union. Te European Framework Programmes supported over the next two decades these applied social research institutes whereas the university department shrunk from this new option for international collaborations. Both the extramural sector and the so-called scientific infrastructure for soci

身心疲憊

,Concluding Remarks on ‘Social Impact’ and ‘Scholarly Success’,r social activists. Looking at the different spheres of impact, one finds that in Austria sociologists are well represented in mass media. With regard to the policy relevance it seems that in some fields a longtime influence can be traced but lack of data calls for a reserved interpretation. With re