Titlebook: Social Justice in Practice; Questions in Ethics Juha R?ikk? Book 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 Attributing Self-

新石器時(shí)代

書(shū)目名稱Social Justice in Practice影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Social Justice in Practice影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Social Justice in Practice網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Social Justice in Practice網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Social Justice in Practice被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Social Justice in Practice被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Social Justice in Practice年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Social Justice in Practice年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Social Justice in Practice讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Social Justice in Practice讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

贊美者

The Dilemma of Conservative Justice, Sidgwick asks whether political reforms that have a morally desirable goal could justifiably be rejected simply on the grounds that implementing them would spoil the life plans of those who believe that the future would be like the past. The paradox is that “ideal justice” demands that we carry out

調(diào)味品

Oscillate

Presumptions and Obligations, have also frequently been applied in contexts that are at least seemingly unrelated to decisions concerning how to act, a natural way to read presumption rules is that their prime aim is to guide action. For instance, to say that there is a presumption of equality is to imply that cases should be t

蜿蜒而流

舊石器

On the Ethical Acceptability of Conspiracy Theories,y theorizing [1]. Creating and disseminating conspiracy theories is a mental and social activity. Thus, it is natural to ask whether it is a fair and desirable activity. It is generally known that our attitudes toward conspiracy theories can have important consequences. The worldview common to consp

割讓

Privacy and Relativism,ance on how to behave [1]. This is because what is polite in one culture need not be polite in another. The norm that we should try to respect people’s privacy seems to be as vague as the norm of behaving politely. Respecting privacy seems to require different behavior in different cultures, and it

不斷的變動(dòng)

Unrevealed Information and Social Relations,ould not be able to have thoughts without voicing them at the same time, whether they be awake or asleep, whether in company of others or alone” [1]. Life on that planet would not be especially pleasant, for hearing others’ thoughts would most probably lead to conflicts. As Kant writes, unless its i

jumble

The Ethics of Alien Beliefs,false, but still hold such a belief. When asked what she believes about something, it is likely that she simply expresses her opinion about the issue in question, and this reveals what she takes herself to believe, but not necessarily what she . believes. In some cases, however, a person may adopt a

殺菌劑

Fairness and Forgiveness,gy, and philosophy [1]. While the notions of collective and political forgiveness have been the most popular issues, the older themes concerning the definition and ethics of forgiveness have still evoked discussion [2]. Some of the questions in the field are very specific, such as the question of wh