找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪(fǎng)問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Social Class, Social Action, and Education; The Failure of Progr Aaron Schutz Book 2010 Aaron Schutz 2010 civil rights.community.community

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 46982|回復(fù): 42
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:22:40 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Social Class, Social Action, and Education
副標(biāo)題The Failure of Progr
編輯Aaron Schutz
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/870/869337/869337.mp4
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: Social Class, Social Action, and Education; The Failure of Progr Aaron Schutz Book 2010 Aaron Schutz 2010 civil rights.community.community
描述Schutz demonstrates that progressive ideas of democracy emerged out of the practices of a new middle class, reacting, in part, against the more conflictive social struggles of the working-class. The volume traces two distinct branches of democratic progressivism: collaborative and personalist.
出版日期Book 2010
關(guān)鍵詞civil rights; community; community organizing; conflict; democracy; education; empowerment; John Dewey; soli
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/9780230113572
isbn_softcover978-1-349-29020-8
isbn_ebook978-0-230-11357-2
copyrightAaron Schutz 2010
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Social Class, Social Action, and Education影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Social Class, Social Action, and Education影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Social Class, Social Action, and Education網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Social Class, Social Action, and Education網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Social Class, Social Action, and Education被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Social Class, Social Action, and Education被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Social Class, Social Action, and Education年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Social Class, Social Action, and Education年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Social Class, Social Action, and Education讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Social Class, Social Action, and Education讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

1票 100.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶(hù)組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:20:00 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:48:40 | 只看該作者
Community Organizingmocratic practice in academia. This chapter turns away from these middle-class visions to examine an alternative approach I call “democratic solidarity,” drawn largely from working-class experiences and cultural practices: . in the tradition of Saul Alinsky.
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:35:17 | 只看該作者
Building Bridges?people who cling to impossible dreams of public “reason” and “collaboration” that have little relationship to the real workings of power in the lives of those who suffer in America. He had little use for middle-class progressives and their efforts to create a democratic society focused on the unique identities of individuals.
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:14:15 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:25:04 | 只看該作者
Book 2010Schutz demonstrates that progressive ideas of democracy emerged out of the practices of a new middle class, reacting, in part, against the more conflictive social struggles of the working-class. The volume traces two distinct branches of democratic progressivism: collaborative and personalist.
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 20:22:06 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230113572civil rights; community; community organizing; conflict; democracy; education; empowerment; John Dewey; soli
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 00:22:26 | 只看該作者
Overview: Schutz demonstrates that progressive ideas of democracy emerged out of the practices of a new middle class, reacting, in part, against the more conflictive social struggles of the working-class. The volume traces two distinct branches of democratic progressivism: collaborative and personalist.978-1-349-29020-8978-0-230-11357-2
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:40:00 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:51:13 | 只看該作者
Social Class and Social Action century since then, scholars across the social sciences and humanities have found different aspects of progressive democratic practice extremely compelling, even though few if any of their hopes for social transformation have ever come to fruition.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-18 04:25
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
舒兰市| 鲁甸县| 洛浦县| 麟游县| 清河县| 洪洞县| 保德县| 连山| 平远县| 鄂州市| 海宁市| 麻江县| 儋州市| 福海县| 微博| 息烽县| 樟树市| 额敏县| 永丰县| 呈贡县| 中阳县| 桐庐县| 江阴市| 静安区| 方山县| 临桂县| 黄大仙区| 金溪县| 兴文县| 张家口市| 富阳市| 兴义市| 会理县| 中宁县| 都兰县| 同江市| 沁阳市| 泸定县| 昭平县| 上高县| 儋州市|