Titlebook: Shakespeare’s Impact on his Contemporaries; E. A. J. Honigmann Book 1982 E.A.J. Honigmann 1982 Britain.history.history of literature.liter

美麗動人

書目名稱Shakespeare’s Impact on his Contemporaries影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Shakespeare’s Impact on his Contemporaries影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Shakespeare’s Impact on his Contemporaries網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Shakespeare’s Impact on his Contemporaries網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名




書目名稱Shakespeare’s Impact on his Contemporaries被引頻次




書目名稱Shakespeare’s Impact on his Contemporaries被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Shakespeare’s Impact on his Contemporaries年度引用




書目名稱Shakespeare’s Impact on his Contemporaries年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Shakespeare’s Impact on his Contemporaries讀者反饋




書目名稱Shakespeare’s Impact on his Contemporaries讀者反饋學科排名

legislate

,Shakespeare’ s Reply to Criticism,1612. The first criticism that shows resentment is the epistle ‘To the Reader’ printed with . (1612); perhaps, then, Jonson courteously — or diplomatically — refrained from speaking out until his rival had departed from London.

cancellous-bone

相同

Contemporary Criticisms of Shakespeare,mably from hearsay, that in ‘reading some bombast speeches of ., which are not to be understood, he [Jonson] used to say that it was horrour’.. Dryden, though he expressed himself more generously elsewhere, shared Greene’s and Jonson’s attitude when he wrote in his Preface to . (1679):

ACRID

Infant

The Writer,icular did they admire? Was he really ‘rated at something like his true value’? A great deal of contemporary evidence survives — and some of it, again, has been misinterpreted and needs to be reconsidered in its contemporary setting.

CAJ

Engulf

inveigh

擋泥板

The Writer,icular did they admire? Was he really ‘rated at something like his true value’? A great deal of contemporary evidence survives — and some of it, again, has been misinterpreted and needs to be reconsidered in its contemporary setting.