Titlebook: Self-Defense in International Relations; Ruchi Anand Book 2009 Ruchi Anand 2009 international law.international relations.law.politics

estrange

書目名稱Self-Defense in International Relations影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Self-Defense in International Relations影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Self-Defense in International Relations網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Self-Defense in International Relations網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Self-Defense in International Relations被引頻次




書目名稱Self-Defense in International Relations被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Self-Defense in International Relations年度引用




書目名稱Self-Defense in International Relations年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Self-Defense in International Relations讀者反饋




書目名稱Self-Defense in International Relations讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

金哥占卜者

Ruchi Anandsrael Dov M. GABBA Y PART 0 AN INTRODUCTION TO GENERAL INTENSIONAL LOGICS CHAPTER 0 CONSEQUENCE RELATIONS Motivation We introduce the notions of a consequence relation (which is a generalization of the notion of a logical system) and of a semantics. We show that every consequence relation is complet

白楊魚

絕種

se to the Stokes and the anti-Stokes wings in the stimulated spectrum. Such stimulated scattering was observed at a small angle (~2°) with respect to the direction of propagation of the exciting light, whereas at large scattering angles only the Stokes wing was observed. These results were in agreem

Generic-Drug

Ruchi Anands of a consequence relation (which is a generalization of the notion of a logical system) and of a semantics. We show that every consequence relation is complet978-94-010-1453-3Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292

wall-stress

Ruchi Anands of a consequence relation (which is a generalization of the notion of a logical system) and of a semantics. We show that every consequence relation is complet978-94-010-1453-3Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292

大罵

cacophony

International Legal Exceptions to the Prohibition on the Use of Force, of which the use of force may be justified.. These exceptions are the use of force by the Security Council under Chapter VII in case of a “threat to peace, breach of peace and act of aggression,” and the right to use force under Article 51 in individual or collective self-defense.

noxious

http://image.papertrans.cn/s/image/864428.jpg

滴注

Book 2009The right to individual and collective self-defense in international law and politics has always been a controversial issue. Using the example of how the US employs self-defense against Iraq, this book uncovers new dimensions, which lead to innovative and practical strategies and analysis.