找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Scientia in Early Modern Philosophy; Seventeenth-Century Tom Sorell,G.A. Rogers,Jill Kraye Book 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 54854|回復(fù): 41
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:04:38 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Scientia in Early Modern Philosophy
副標(biāo)題Seventeenth-Century
編輯Tom Sorell,G.A. Rogers,Jill Kraye
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/863/862676/862676.mp4
概述Accessible study of the early modern philosophers dispute on Scientia.Philosophers surveyed : Spinoza, Hobbes, Descartes, Gassendi, Locke and Jungius.Through top contributors a must-read for everybody
叢書名稱Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
圖書封面Titlebook: Scientia in Early Modern Philosophy; Seventeenth-Century  Tom Sorell,G.A. Rogers,Jill Kraye Book 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
描述.Scientia is the term that early modern philosophers applied to a certain kind of demonstrative knowledge, the kind whose starting points were appropriate first principles. In pre-modern philosophy, too, scientia was the name for demonstrative knowledge from first principles. But pre-modern and early modern conceptions differ systematically from one another. This book offers a variety of glimpses of this difference by exploring the works of individual philosophers as well as philosophical movements and groupings of the period. Some of the figures are transitional, falling neatly on neither side of the allegiances usually marked by the scholastic/modern distinction. Among the philosophers whose views on scientia are surveyed are Hobbes, Descartes, Spinoza, Gassendi, Locke, and Jungius. The contributors are among the best-known and most influential historians of early modern philosophy..
出版日期Book 2010
關(guān)鍵詞John Locke; René Descartes; Spinoza; knowledge; natural philosophy
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3077-1
isbn_softcover978-94-007-3080-9
isbn_ebook978-90-481-3077-1Series ISSN 1871-7381 Series E-ISSN 2215-1958
issn_series 1871-7381
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Scientia in Early Modern Philosophy影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Scientia in Early Modern Philosophy影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Scientia in Early Modern Philosophy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Scientia in Early Modern Philosophy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Scientia in Early Modern Philosophy被引頻次




書目名稱Scientia in Early Modern Philosophy被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Scientia in Early Modern Philosophy年度引用




書目名稱Scientia in Early Modern Philosophy年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Scientia in Early Modern Philosophy讀者反饋




書目名稱Scientia in Early Modern Philosophy讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:16:03 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:26:38 | 只看該作者
, and , in the , of Joachim Jungius,debates about methodology, Timothy Reiss re-examined the influential thesis of J. H. Randall’s . (1961) which presented the logical writings of Jacopo Zabarella as an important stage in the development of scientific method in the seventeenth century.
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:07:02 | 只看該作者
, and the Sciences in Descartes,he conception that comes into play in a well-known passage from the Replies in which he explains how an atheist can and can’t know that the angles of a triangle add up to two right angles: the atheist cannot know in the sense of having an unshakeable conviction that the two angles add up to two righ
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:31:27 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:56:57 | 只看該作者
, in Hobbes,ribution to the development of epistemology in the early modern period. The centerpiece of Hobbes’s theory of knowledge is his account of ., or deductively structured systematic knowledge that is grounded in the consideration of causes.
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:50:55 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:07:49 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:18:23 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:58:29 | 只看該作者
Philosophia, Historia, Mathematica: Shifting Sands in the Disciplinary Geography of the Seventeentheenth-century scientists were, an important part of the story lies in the disciplinary and institutional history of that important century. What was new and important was not only Copernicus and Kepler, Descartes and Galileo, Leibniz and Newton, but the changes that happened in the larger framework in which they work.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-18 21:43
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
灌阳县| 独山县| 信宜市| 凉山| 博客| 上栗县| 延津县| 嫩江县| 灵石县| 罗江县| 塔河县| 佳木斯市| 周宁县| 隆德县| 榆中县| 娄底市| 迁西县| 防城港市| 连城县| 湘阴县| 平定县| 贞丰县| 廊坊市| 监利县| 轮台县| 吉安县| 玉溪市| 商城县| 万宁市| 萨迦县| 新源县| 河南省| 沙洋县| 巨野县| 景德镇市| 渭南市| 汽车| 桦南县| 枝江市| 大埔县| 邛崃市|