Titlebook: Same-Sex Couples before National, Supranational and International Jurisdictions; Daniele Gallo,Luca Paladini,Pietro Pustorino Book 2014 Sp

cliche

Same-Sex Couples Before Courts in Mexico, Central and South Americaa deeply-rooted traditional culture that has shaped most civil institutions, including marriage and civil unions, and the way they are perceived. As a result, relationships between people of the same sex have usually been prohibited and, at times, criminalized. A process of change, however, has been

顯赫的人

Following the Legislative Leaders: Judicial Recognition of Same Sex Couples in Australia and New ZeaParliament recently legislated for same-sex marriage. Despite attempts, same-sex marriage has not been achieved in Australia, although at the time of writing there were bills before Parliaments that, if passed, would enable same-sex marriage at either the State/Territory or Federal level. This chapt

緯度

The Nordic Model: Same-Sex Families in Love and Lawelled on principles of equality and social security. The Nordic Countries were the first in the world to incorporate same-sex relationships into the sphere of traditional family law. One of the most outstanding features of the legal development in this area is the trust in the democratic processes a

使閉塞

A Glorious Revolution? UK Courts and Same-Sex Couplesade on this issue as between equality law and human rights law. Equality law is about the State changing society, by legislating to instruct and educate institutions and individuals as to how they might act in their public interactions: thus employers and employees, teacher and pupils, providers of

顧客

Between Recognition and Homophobia: Same-Sex Couples in Eastern Europes, local specificity challenges the theory of incremental changes that, as applied to Western European countries, assumes a step-by-step progress from the decriminalization of sodomy, through the prohibition of sexual orientation and to the recognition of same-sex partnership or marriage. In Eastern

矛盾心理

Same-Sex Couples in France and Belgium: The Resilient Practice of Judicial Deferencetors: they frame the terms of the democratic debate. In legal systems where courts have no formal law-making powers, questions of recognition are quickly transformed into institutional questions in which the responsibility of the legislator remains central. The French and Belgian cases, in that resp

Mri485

ALERT

Judicial Restraint and Political Responsibility: A Review of the Jurisprudence of the Italian, Spanilitical actors, courts refuse to act as . actors. In the jurisdictions under analysis—Italy, Spain and Portugal—the judiciary chose to give precedence to the Legislator, stating it was the province of the latter to regulate the issue. The main argument put forward was that the Constitutions at stake

SENT

adhesive