Titlebook: STACS 99; 16th Annual Symposiu Christoph Meinel,Sophie Tison Conference proceedings 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999 Automat.alg

Transfusion

胰臟

Graves’-disease

盲信者

我要沮喪

perpetual

原諒

BRAND

Ming-Yang Kao,Andrzej Lingas,Anna ?stlinion of cathedrals”. They are constructivist and practical metaphors that can be considered emblematic of the post-positivist conception of law. As such, they challenge the nuclear thesis of legal positivism: the value-free neutrality of law. This thesis implies that the legal domain is institutional

最初

無(wú)思維能力

Vesa Halava,Mika Hirvensalo,Ronald de Wolfomy for Raz and Hart is realisable in relative terms, as they would accept that law’s ultimate determination depends on social facts; moreover, they argued for no sharp . between law and morality. This scenario renders the law’s autonomy claim superfluous. Conversely, Kelsen articulated a cogent arg