Titlebook: Rudolf Carnap, Logical Empiricist; Materials and Perspe Jaakko Hintikka Book 1975 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1975 Rudolf Car

獎牌

Quine on Quantifying In: A Dialogue,arrow sense (necessity and possibility) and with the concepts known as propositional attitudes (e.g., knowledge, belief, memory, wishing, striving, hoping, etc.). Why such usage presents us with a problem will be explained later in this chapter.

修改

Knowledge, Belief, and Logical Consequence,itably strong and possibly idealized sense) are invariant with respect to logical equivalence. This invariance may in turn be taken to amount to the validity of the rules of inference . where ‘...’ is to be read ‘. knows that .’ and ‘...’ ‘. believes that .’.

連鎖,連串

尖牙

Rudolf Carnap, Logical Empiricist,cerns the different grammatical constructions in which it normally occurs (insofar as there is a non-trivial difference in meaning between them). Some distinctions between such constructions have figured prominently in recent philosophical literature. A case in point is Ryle’s emphasis on the distin

FLOAT

光明正大

A Construction of Quality Classes Improved,, it seems to me. These philosophical insights are rather precarious, however, for they can easily be spoiled by a wrong treatment of individuals in one’s semantics. Some of the relevant differences among different kinds of treatments were discussed in my earlier paper ‘The Semantics of Modal Notion

天空

詞匯

斷斷續(xù)續(xù)

Quine on Quantifying In: A Dialogue, more generally, the possibility of using such referential notions as quantifiers and identity meaningfully in combination with modal notions in the narrow sense (necessity and possibility) and with the concepts known as propositional attitudes (e.g., knowledge, belief, memory, wishing, striving, ho

細(xì)胞