Titlebook: Romanticism and the Cultures of Infancy; Martina Domines Veliki,Cian Duffy Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), unde

Petechiae

William Godwin, Romantic-Era Historiography and the Political Cultures of Infancy,win under the pseudonym Edward Baldwin: . (1806), . (1809) and . (1822). Hansson shows how these histories participate in the ongoing debate in the Romantic period about the uses of Classical and modern history in the education of children and he traces the connections between them and the political

強有力

Experimenting with Children: Infants in the Scientific Imagination,l philosophers: Erasmus Darwin, Thomas Wedgwood, and Humphry Davy. Starting with a reading of Mary Shelley’s . (1818) as a reflection on (amongst other things) the development of cognition in infants, Robertson works back to the materialist theories of mind developed in the 1740s by the English asso

違抗

detach

Coleridge, the Ridiculous Child, and the Limits of Romanticism,sopher responding directly to Richter’s ideas; as a writer of the ridiculous in relation to nature, society, and infancy; and as himself a figure of the ridiculous in both satirical writing from the Romantic-period and more recent fiction for children.

Conquest

and representation of childhood and children’s literature.S.This collection of essays explores the remarkable range and cultural significance of the engagement with ‘infancy’ during the Romantic period.? Taking its point of departure in the commonplace claim that the Romantics invented childhood, t

Eructation

Introduction: The Romantic Cultures of Infancy,the volume as a whole: that the engagement with infancy during the Romantic period reveals some key features of the Romantic episteme, that is, the manner in which knowledge was produced and structured at the time.

結(jié)束

無孔

,Educational Experiments: Childhood Sympathy, Regulation, and Object-Relations in Maria Edgeworth’s ent ideas and with emergent, Romantic paradigms. In so doing, he not only sheds new light on Edgeworth’s work but also questions the adequacy of some of the binary categorizations which scholars have applied to considerations of infancy at the time.

根除

,‘Advice […] by one as insignificant as a MOUSE’: Human and Non-human Infancy in Eighteenth-Century y with but also to transcend the pre-rational animal protagonist. The narrative structures of these tales, in H?ing’s analysis, therefore combine both an Enlightenment view of infancy as a limited developmental stage with an emergent Romantic valorisation of the sensibility and sympathy of infancy.

CLOWN

William Godwin, Romantic-Era Historiography and the Political Cultures of Infancy,extent to which writing for children during the Romantic period mirrored the political concerns of works aimed at adult readers, but also articulate a connection between the education of children in history and the promotion of a progressive, political agenda.