Titlebook: Romantic Cosmopolitanism; Esther Wohlgemut Book 2009 Esther Wohlgemut 2009 English literature.language.national identity.nationalism.Roman

褪色

難聽的聲音

2634-6516 s in contrast to more unified models such as Edmund Burke‘s which found nationality in, among other things, language, history, blood and geography.978-1-349-31247-4978-0-230-25099-4Series ISSN 2634-6516 Series E-ISSN 2634-6524

jet-lag

Cosmopolitan Figures and Cosmopolitan Literary Forms, of social union and the underlying antagonism that prompts their formation. What this means for the nation is that it (like all other fantasies of social union) is inherently unstable: ‘every process of identification conferring on us a fixed socio-symbolic identity’, ?i?ek insists, ‘is ultimately doomed to fail’ (127).

Spartan

頂點(diǎn)

A Cosmopolitan Nation?: Kant, Burke and the Question of Borders, Gellner casts him, by contrast, as an eighteenth-century internationalist.. This divergence provides a useful frame for thinking about the relationship between nationalism and cosmopolitanism at a crucial historical moment in modern European history. For both Kedourie and Gellner, Kant functions as

adulterant

,‘A Great Federacy’ of Nations: Internationalism and the ,course. In fact, it enters into the pages of the most influential periodical of the time, the .. Arising out of the eighteenth-century tradition of moral philosophy, the early . . viewed itself as an instrument of political enlightenment, making the point immediately in its first volume not only by

眼界

調(diào)情

Porous Borders: Maria Edgeworth and the Question of National Identity,t came to their understanding of Britain itself. In particular, the question arose in the early years of the century in relation to Ireland, now a member of the British polity as a consequence of the 1801 Act of Union. Ireland’s incorporation put pressure on the dominant Burkean conception of nation

Lacunar-Stroke

Ovulation