Titlebook: Risk in The New York Times (1987–2014); A corpus-based explo Jens O. Zinn,Daniel McDonald Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The A

detumescence

書目名稱Risk in The New York Times (1987–2014)影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Risk in The New York Times (1987–2014)影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Risk in The New York Times (1987–2014)網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Risk in The New York Times (1987–2014)網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Risk in The New York Times (1987–2014)被引頻次




書目名稱Risk in The New York Times (1987–2014)被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Risk in The New York Times (1987–2014)年度引用




書目名稱Risk in The New York Times (1987–2014)年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Risk in The New York Times (1987–2014)讀者反饋




書目名稱Risk in The New York Times (1987–2014)讀者反饋學科排名

表臉

Risk in The New York Times (1987–2014)978-3-319-64158-4Series ISSN 2523-7268 Series E-ISSN 2523-7276

bromide

Critical Studies in Risk and Uncertaintyhttp://image.papertrans.cn/r/image/830761.jpg

腐蝕

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64158-4Risk and culture; Risk society thesis; Communication of possible harm; Computational linguistics; Gramma

壯麗的去

相互影響

Introduction, all kinds of risk and also actively take risks. However, it remains an open question to what degree life has become riskier compared to earlier times. While a number of social theories compete in explaining the shift towards risk, there remains little research that examines the relative explanatory

圍巾

Conceptual Foundations,nd changing meanings of risk in social debates. We argue that language reflects both public debates about risk and long-term social change. We argue that frequency counting of lexical items cannot provide insights into the shifting meaning of risk. Therefore, we introduce elements of. and. ., in ord

淘氣

B-cell

偶然