Titlebook: Rights, Wrongs and Responsibilities; Matthew H. Kramer (Reader in Legal and Political P Book 2001 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmil

insipid

CODA

Choice and Circumstance,ill reflects the tendency casually to consign theories to egalitarian or anti-egalitarian categories, the customary litmus test being that of how closely a theory’s normative conclusions approach something like equality of well-being. And nowhere has this tendency been more evident than in the commo

carotenoids

Rights, Rationality and the Law of Negligence,rence to the ideal of corrective justice. This ideal specifies that those responsible for the wrongful infliction of harm on others should restore the latter to the .. Corrective justice invests . rights with significance, since it can reasonably be regarded as providing negligence law (and tort more generally) with its central purpose..

誓言

Choice and Circumstance,tings, the soundness of this general taxonomy has increasingly been placed in doubt.. One key factor in advancing this doubt has been the desire, on the part of many egalitarian thinkers, to introduce considerations of . into their accounts of just distribution.

火花

Property and Justice,eption of the private law as a system of corrective justice that is supposedly insulated from the concerns of distributive justice that dominate the political process. This chapter examines the effect of this perspective on our understanding of property.

Liberate

Subdue

are carefully explained.The variability in application of thRapid progress in the technique and practice of virtual colonoscopy as well as the conti- ing clinical high interest for this radiodiagnostic procedure made this second edition, only 3 years after the publication of the ? rst edition of thi

glisten

Hannelore Schlafferff“gegenüber dem Mainstream in Politologie und Soziologie konzipiert, ist Olsons Ansatz kollektiven Handelns sowohl in seiner Einfachheit als auch Eleganz zumindest auf den ersten Blick bestechend (vgl. Keller 1988: 188; Knoke 1990a: 33f.; Klandermans 1991: 24). Gerade weil Olson die gesamte empiris

同來核對

拋射物