Titlebook: Rights and Wrongs; Rethinking the Found William C. Heffernan Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive lic

sinoatrial-node

BINGE

State-Imposed Punishmentny respects. It is far from completely satisfactory, however. The Court has held capital punishment to be constitutionally acceptable, for instance. It has also declined to impose a minimal proportionality standard on noncapital sentencing. And it has not established a comprehensive standard for reg

exceed

Equality: Racial and Class Disparities in State-Imposed Punishmentuestion takes on special urgency given the fact that criminal defendants are disproportionately African-American and also disproportionately poor. The Court has partially addressed this by holding that indigent defendants charged with felonies and serious misdemeanors are constitutionally entitled t

Foment

Thinking About Justicer constraints applicable even to those who might benefit by disregarding them. This point has no bearing, however, on those who are unmotivated by the possibility of fair cooperation. For them, restraint and condemnation may be essential if social life based on justice is to be protected.

Myocyte

縮影

圓木可阻礙

兩種語言

2731-0604 theory.Provides a framework for assessing the state’s perfor.This book seeks to explain why the concept of justice is critical to the study of criminal justice. Heffernan makes such a case by treating state-sponsored punishment as the defining feature of criminal justice. In particular, this work ac

有權(quán)

squander

Equality: Racial and Class Disparities in State-Imposed Punishment This final chapter considers both issues. Indigence may never serve as a barrier to representation by counsel in criminal cases. Moreover, juror and prosecutorial discretion must be limited to maximize the risk of bias when imposing punishment.