Titlebook: Richard Titmuss; Welfare and Society; Welfare and Society David Reisman Book 2001Latest edition Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan

dissolution

Stigma help where the need is greatest and the ability to pay least. Titmuss, however, rejected such selectivity. Partly this was because of his belief (the subject of Part Four) that private enterprise in the field of welfare is a mixed blessing even for those who can pay. Partly it was because he was convinced that a dual system involves stigma.

背心

Universalism II: Integration and Involvements and a sense of involvement. It is clearly not suitable for a subject such as social administration — of which the ‘primary areas of unifying interest are centred in those social institutions that foster integration and discourage alienation’..

incarcerate

Universalism III: Planned Redistributionxes) and provides benefits (in cash or in kind). Redistribution occurs when the money claimed in taxes is not restored in precisely the same measure in the form of benefits to precisely those taxpayers who provided it, but is redirected instead from one person or group to another person or group.

歡笑

Part One: Evaluations and Extensionsl purpose and an acceptance that there are limits beyond which the statistics will never go. What it all adds up to is this, that ‘social administration as a subject is not a messy conglomeration of the technical .’. but instead a focus for the ‘imaginative excitements of unifying perspectives and principles’..

abnegate

Universalism I: Social Costs and Social Benefitsementary to growth in the private sector but is not provided by it. This chapter will examine these two reasons for the provision of social benefits to cover social costs in the social and economic thought of Richard Titmuss.

chlorosis

Book 2001Latest edition of Social Policy and Administration. He made a valuable contribution to social philosophy through his attempt to integrate welfare into its broad social context. In this revised edition of his well-known book, Professor Reisman relies on the whole of Titmuss‘s work, unpublished as well as published

嚴(yán)厲譴責(zé)

和藹

The Failure of the Market II: Choicet a simple confrontation between, on the one hand, institutional inertia, and, on the other, domiciliary inaction.’. The Welfare State is justifiable precisely in terms of the need to defend the freedom of consumer choice.

ostrish

The Failure of the Market III: Quantitys been politicised into social policy. Three examples from the world of medical care illustrate the logic that led Titmuss to conclude that American capitalism had not performed well in the field of quantity supplied.

濕潤(rùn)