找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Rhetoricians on Argumentation; Christian Kock Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Spring

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 女孩
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 12:25:55 | 只看該作者
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 15:18:06 | 只看該作者
Rhetorical Citizenship and the Science of Science Communication, issues (GMO crops, vaccinations, climate change) sectors of the public hold views differing from those of most scientists, and they often do not support proposals based on the scientists’ views. The overall cultural authority of science has also been challenged in the last decade by several negativ
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 21:02:53 | 只看該作者
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 22:16:48 | 只看該作者
Eddo Rigotti and Sara Greco: Inference in Argumentation. A Topics-Based Approach to Argument Schemeon the pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation that was developed by van Eemeren and Grootendorst (see esp. van Eemeren 2018; van Eemeren and Grootendorst 2004), is a model for the study of argument schemes.
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 04:12:28 | 只看該作者
Book 2022on that identifies defining features of a rhetorical approach to argumentation which has several corollaries, including the special status of argumentation about action, the condition of uncertainty and the necessity of securing adherence from an audience.?Chapters explore topics such as the propert
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 08:30:50 | 只看該作者
Underlying Assumptions of Examining Argumentation Rhetorically,e its seemingly adversarial nature, argumentation is fundamentally cooperative, pursuing the shared goal of making the best decision; and (5) argumentation is grounded in the situational context of particular cases.
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 11:01:29 | 只看該作者
Rhetorical Structures, Deliberative Ecologies, and the Conditions for Democratic Argumentation,mentation are made possible by structures that promote collaborative communication practices. This means that practical, public argument is not just a matter of making valid claims, but also a matter of effective contexts that can improve the quality of argumentation.
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 15:13:30 | 只看該作者
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 22:12:58 | 只看該作者
e communication, and other features within the realm of rhetorical argumentation. This book is relevant to students and researchers in linguistics, rhetoric, philosophy, argumentation studies, and communication studies..Previously published in .Argumentation. Volume 34, issue 3, September 2020.978-3-031-18804-6978-3-031-18802-2
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 00:15:02 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-7 19:03
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
常德市| 望江县| 九龙坡区| 温州市| 新津县| 仁化县| 宿迁市| 绥芬河市| 巩义市| 浦东新区| 宣汉县| 合山市| 麻栗坡县| 南投县| 儋州市| 依兰县| 葫芦岛市| 靖安县| 龙井市| 梨树县| 呼伦贝尔市| 诸暨市| 辽宁省| 西贡区| 剑川县| 涡阳县| 四平市| 会同县| 临朐县| 汕尾市| 关岭| 新蔡县| 万荣县| 兴山县| 黄龙县| 繁峙县| 南江县| 象州县| 丹寨县| 苗栗市| 洛隆县|