找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Revisiting Shakespeare’s Lost Play; Cardenio/Double Fals Deborah C. Payne Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 Ap

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 15668|回復(fù): 35
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:36:19 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Revisiting Shakespeare’s Lost Play
副標(biāo)題Cardenio/Double Fals
編輯Deborah C. Payne
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/830/829837/829837.mp4
概述Moves away from traditional readings of the play, which have nearly all been in the context of its contested ‘lost play‘ status, and reads it in the context of the eighteenth century.By emphasizing th
圖書封面Titlebook: Revisiting Shakespeare’s Lost Play; Cardenio/Double Fals Deborah C. Payne Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 Ap
描述This collection of essays centres on .Double Falsehood., Lewis Theobald’s 1727 adaptation of the “l(fā)ost” play of Cardenio, possibly co-authored by John Fletcher and William Shakespeare. In a departure from most scholarship to date, the contributors fold .Double Falsehood. back into the milieu for which it was created rather than searching for traces of Shakespeare in the text. Robert D. Hume’s knowledge of theatre history permits a fresh take on the forgery question as well as the Shakespeare authorship controversy. Diana Solomon’s understanding of eighteenth-century rape culture and Jean I. Marsden’s command of contemporary adaptation practices both emphasise the play’s immediate social and theatrical contexts. And, finally, Deborah C. Payne’s familiarity with the eighteenth-century stage allows for a reconsideration of .Double Falsehood. as integral to a debate between Theobald, Alexander Pope, and John Gay over the future of the English drama..
出版日期Book 2016
關(guān)鍵詞Apocrypha; Theatre history; Lewis Theobald; Drama; Early modern
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46514-2
isbn_softcover978-3-319-83533-4
isbn_ebook978-3-319-46514-2
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Revisiting Shakespeare’s Lost Play影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Revisiting Shakespeare’s Lost Play影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Revisiting Shakespeare’s Lost Play網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Revisiting Shakespeare’s Lost Play網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Revisiting Shakespeare’s Lost Play被引頻次




書目名稱Revisiting Shakespeare’s Lost Play被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Revisiting Shakespeare’s Lost Play年度引用




書目名稱Revisiting Shakespeare’s Lost Play年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Revisiting Shakespeare’s Lost Play讀者反饋




書目名稱Revisiting Shakespeare’s Lost Play讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 23:01:15 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:44:00 | 只看該作者
The Jolt of Jacobean Tragicomedy: , on the Eighteenth-Century English Stage,s. Nowhere is this more apparent than in its treatment of rape. Like Jacobean and unlike Restoration and eighteenth-century tragicomedies, the play features a rape victim who survives and redeems the perpetrator through marriage. And while the epilogue cannot prove that the play was written by Shake
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:00:17 | 只看該作者
,Ghostwriting: Lewis Theobald’s , as Adaptation, considers . within the context of the eighteenth-century dramatic repertoire, especially adaptations of Shakespeare and Theobald’s own output. The treatment of the female characters, Leonora and Violante, is compared to the representation of women in popular tragedies of the period. Henriquez’s rap
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:34:28 | 只看該作者
Textual Skirmishes and Theatrical Frays: , versus the Scriblerians,obald perceived as the inherent anti-theatricalism of the Scriblerian burlesque. To plays such as . and—in a pre-emptive move—. Theobald countered with . an old-fashioned, affective tragicomedy that exemplified the qualities he valued in serious drama, specifically its ability to use classically cra
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:40:03 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:05:31 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:00:07 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:32:07 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:25:44 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-21 17:19
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
岑溪市| 安远县| 绍兴县| 东阿县| 子洲县| 庆云县| 运城市| 沾益县| 乡城县| 阿拉善左旗| 南溪县| 巫山县| 大竹县| 高雄县| 越西县| 无为县| 高邑县| 嘉黎县| 兴业县| 阿拉善右旗| 南涧| 翼城县| 揭阳市| 高密市| 汾西县| 临海市| 攀枝花市| 郯城县| 山东| 睢宁县| 荥经县| 鹤庆县| 镇安县| 沙河市| 陵川县| 都昌县| 德庆县| 萝北县| 会同县| 子洲县| 宜宾县|