Titlebook: Revisioning Cambridge Platonism: Sources and Legacy; Douglas Hedley,David Leech Book 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 Seventeenth

珍珠無(wú)

書(shū)目名稱Revisioning Cambridge Platonism: Sources and Legacy影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Revisioning Cambridge Platonism: Sources and Legacy影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Revisioning Cambridge Platonism: Sources and Legacy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Revisioning Cambridge Platonism: Sources and Legacy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Revisioning Cambridge Platonism: Sources and Legacy被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Revisioning Cambridge Platonism: Sources and Legacy被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Revisioning Cambridge Platonism: Sources and Legacy年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Revisioning Cambridge Platonism: Sources and Legacy年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Revisioning Cambridge Platonism: Sources and Legacy讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Revisioning Cambridge Platonism: Sources and Legacy讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

思考才皺眉

,Mixing Politics with the?Pulpit: Eternal Immutable Morality and Richard Price’s Political Radicalisical and moderate movements. A commitment to eternal and immutable reality is shared with the more moderate Burke while Price’s own anti-materialist, dualistic and theologically motivated radicalism marks a significant departure from some of his most important Dissenting contemporaries, including Joseph Priestley.

LEERY

0066-6610 atures an interdisciplinary focus.This volume contains essays that examine the work and legacy of the Cambridge Platonists. The essays reappraise the ideas of this key group of English thinkers who served as a key link between the Renaissance and the modern era...The contributors examine the sources

Contend

The Neoplatonic Hermeneutics of Ralph Cudworth,, the treatment of these texts as sacred implies that their importance is not based on their historical date, but on the authenticity of their doctrine. In a second part, we look briefly to the implications of this singular hermeneutics on Cudworth’s epistemology.

Clumsy

,Cudworth and the?English Debate on the?Trinity,onism, there being no fundamental difference between the Platonic and the Nicean Trinity. For this reason Cudworth strictly distinguishes between a genuine Platonic Trinity and what he calls the Pseudo-Platonic Trinity of pagan Neoplatonism.

Fillet,Filet

endure

, and the?Place of Theurgy in the?Philosophy of Henry More,t synthesis of Plato, Plotinus and the later Platonists operated in the fifteenth century by Marsilio Ficino, relied on the continuity of being between Spirit and Matter, which also justified the presence of daemons and disembodied souls within the natural world. However, More fiercely criticised al

flavonoids

Iniquitous

,‘A Philosopher at Randome’: Translating Jacob B?hme in Seventeenth-Century Cambridge,, or to attributing new meanings to existing ones. B?hme claimed that, properly speaking, his mother-tongue was not German but the ‘language of nature’ (.), the language spoken by Adam before the Fall, and in which essences and words were still in perfect correspondence. This essay investigates how

彎彎曲曲

,Plotinus in Verses: The Epic of Emanation in Henry More’s ,, Henry More laid the groundwork for his life-long inquiry into the nature of the human self. He provided a poetic commentary of Plotinus’s . in which three ontological dimensions?– the life of nature, animal perception and the intellect?– created an allegorical background against which one could ar