Titlebook: Reversible Computation; 15th International C Martin Kutrib,Uwe Meyer Conference proceedings 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Auth

可憐

書目名稱Reversible Computation影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Reversible Computation影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Reversible Computation網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Reversible Computation網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Reversible Computation被引頻次




書目名稱Reversible Computation被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Reversible Computation年度引用




書目名稱Reversible Computation年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Reversible Computation讀者反饋




書目名稱Reversible Computation讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

同義聯(lián)想法

fferent theories and methods in order to understand the mainThis book addresses the nexus of issues exploring governance structures and mechanisms in public service organizations, thus contributing to the development of disciplines that focus on public management. It goes beyond the state of the art

EPT

Ahmet Celal Cem Sayfferent theories and methods in order to understand the mainThis book addresses the nexus of issues exploring governance structures and mechanisms in public service organizations, thus contributing to the development of disciplines that focus on public management. It goes beyond the state of the art

被詛咒的人

fferent theories and methods in order to understand the mainThis book addresses the nexus of issues exploring governance structures and mechanisms in public service organizations, thus contributing to the development of disciplines that focus on public management. It goes beyond the state of the art

misanthrope

Nonporous

calorie

hankering

胖人手藝好

Niklas Deworetzki,Lukas Gailcted or promoted by different structures and processes of governance. The literature offers not only theories that are descriptive or explanatory but also has a strong normative element in that it seeks to provide advice on what is the most appropriate or effective forms of governance. Shleifer and

不可侵犯

Joachim Tilsted Kristensen,Robin Kaarsgaard,Michael Kirkedal Thomsennal features, only to suspend it some years later after it produced an undesirable ruling. This represents a unique and puzzling case of governance transfer ‘roll-back’. We argue that intrinsic demand for the establishment of the Tribunal at the level of the Summit — SADC’s ultimate authority — was