找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Rethinking the Individualism-Holism Debate; Essays in the Philos Julie Zahle,Finn Collin Book 2014 Springer International Publishing Switze

[復制鏈接]
查看: 55296|回復: 51
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:16:06 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Rethinking the Individualism-Holism Debate
副標題Essays in the Philos
編輯Julie Zahle,Finn Collin
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/830/829175/829175.mp4
概述Introduces and covers the newest developments in the individualism/holism debate.Offers the most recent collection of papers on this topic, since 1973.Presents papers by key figures within the debate,
叢書名稱Synthese Library
圖書封面Titlebook: Rethinking the Individualism-Holism Debate; Essays in the Philos Julie Zahle,Finn Collin Book 2014 Springer International Publishing Switze
描述.This collection of papers investigates the most recent debates about individualism and holism in the philosophy of social science. The debates revolve mainly around two issues: firstly, whether social phenomena exist .sui generis. and how they relate to individuals. This is the focus of discussions between ontological individualists and ontological holists. Secondly, to what extent social scientific explanations may and should, focus on individuals and social phenomena respectively. This issue is debated amongst methodological holists and methodological individualists..In social science and philosophy, both issues have been intensively discussed and new versions of the dispute have appeared just as new arguments have been advanced. At present, the individualism/holism debate is extremely lively and this book reflects the major positions and perspectives within the debate. This volume is also relevant to debates about two closely related issues in social science: the micro-macro debate and the agency-structure debate..This book presents contributions from key figures in both social science and philosophy, in the first such collection on this topic to be published since the 1970s..
出版日期Book 2014
關鍵詞Collective Responsibility; Methodological Holism; Methodological individualism; Micro-Macro Relations; O
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05344-8
isbn_softcover978-3-319-34676-2
isbn_ebook978-3-319-05344-8Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292
issn_series 0166-6991
copyrightSpringer International Publishing Switzerland 2014
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Rethinking the Individualism-Holism Debate影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Rethinking the Individualism-Holism Debate影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Rethinking the Individualism-Holism Debate網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Rethinking the Individualism-Holism Debate網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Rethinking the Individualism-Holism Debate被引頻次




書目名稱Rethinking the Individualism-Holism Debate被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Rethinking the Individualism-Holism Debate年度引用




書目名稱Rethinking the Individualism-Holism Debate年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Rethinking the Individualism-Holism Debate讀者反饋




書目名稱Rethinking the Individualism-Holism Debate讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 23:26:52 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:23:56 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 04:50:55 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:03:15 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:59:26 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:48:57 | 只看該作者
Explanatory Strategies Beyond the Individualism/Holism Debateur, while making the best out of the strengths and limitations of the respective explanatory strategies of holists and individualists? Thus, the debate shifts to how exactly pluralism should be understood as the next leading question, going beyond the current individualism/holism debate. The paper e
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:53:49 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:24:40 | 只看該作者
Who Are the Agents? Actor Network Theory, Methodological Individualism, and Reductionhed beyond their normal bounds, which leads to a dissolution of the classical conception of methodological individualism and results in a radical position that is dubbed “methodological particularism”. An examination of this position holds important methodological lessons for social science.
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:23:11 | 只看該作者
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-21 23:00
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
宁海县| 潮州市| 东乡县| 兴海县| 梅州市| 吴忠市| 普陀区| 华宁县| 福鼎市| 鄂州市| 云和县| 安徽省| 石渠县| 十堰市| 车致| 新和县| 巫山县| 长泰县| 即墨市| 朔州市| 迭部县| 德惠市| 封开县| 绍兴市| 塔城市| 山东省| 碌曲县| 福泉市| 桐城市| 名山县| 柳林县| 余姚市| 莱州市| 长葛市| 镇康县| 睢宁县| 蒙城县| 天台县| 临海市| 望江县| 祁门县|