Titlebook: Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison:; Stabilities, Rupture Léna Soler,Howard Sankey,Paul Hoyningen-Huene Book 2008 Springer

阻撓

Commentary on “From One Version to the Other: Intra-Theoretical Change”, by Anouk Barberousseg into account an interesting feature in the evolution of physics – the process of making explicit the content and meaning of a physical theory – Barberousse tries to develop an important topic, namely the central difficulty one encounters when comparing scientific theories and considering scientifi

Ondines-curse

Rodent

An Instrumental Bayesianism Meets the History of Sciences Bayesian approach to analyzing science by studying how far it may be used to model real scientific fields and by locating areas requiring further philosophical work or generalization. Most broadly, Dr. Hartmann’s paper seeks to find a consistent way to explain and characterize the continuity and c

apiary

Is Science Cumulative? a Physicist Viewpointally remain useful, the statement made by some epistemologists that science is not cumulative is difficult to understand. Some might try to relate its validity to a “principle” according to which, to be “really scientific” a theory must be such that the set of its basic laws does not explicitly refe

外面

exercise

木質(zhì)

Some Optimism for the Pessimistt for the referential continuity of the term “electron”, in the face of a history of significant change in our favoured theories about electrons. Nola argues that we can reliably induce that future scientific theories will continue to refer to many of the same entities in the world, such as the elec

alliance

languid

Etymology

Reasons for Choosing Among Readings of Equipollent Theoriesical plausibility. This move is not only defensible theoretically, but evident in the thinking of the scientific community since the seventeenth century. It is also intended to show how conceiving of science as based on iconic model building provides the resources needed to make judgments of ontolog