Titlebook: Restoring the Classic in Sociology; Traditions, Texts an Alan R. How Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 Hermene

散布

聰明

Cantankerous

戲服

禁止,切斷

原告

The Sense of an Ending now altogether more contentious. For its advocates it is something worth cherishing because the virtues of its classics are self-evident. Writing of sociology’s classics, Gianfranco Poggi (1996: 39–40) declared that ‘their unique intellectual texture [and] the magnitude of their scholarly achieveme

名詞

In Pursuit of Identity: Fragmentation, Conflict and Crisisscipline. An important related theme throughout this section is the way sociology tends to diminish the significance of the past, underestimate the importance of tradition, and thereby skew the way it conceives its classics. The classic, I shall argue, links the past and the present; it discloses ho

fodlder

Contested Identity: Sociology in Postmodern Timesl power of self-determination. The work of Beck and Giddens was regarded as more moderate in tone but still shared the assumption that tradition was a restriction on agency, something negative from which the individual would naturally seek to escape.

Painstaking

The Hermeneutic Approachction to it. It is the weakness of these concepts that they rarely acknowledge the gap between what they describe and the relation they have to what preceded them. They disregard the creativity of tradition, habit, custom, and so forth, ignoring the idea that the past and the present interpenetrate

鉗子

Canons and Their Discontentss conceal the collusion classic authors have with the repressive hierarchies of their time. In ‘Why is Classical Theory Classical?’, R.W. Connell (1997: 1511–1157) uses the principles of social constructionism to present a particularly powerful challenge to the validity of the sociological canon, ar