Titlebook: Responding to Catastrophic Events; Consequence Manageme Jeffrey A. Larsen Book 2013 Jeffrey A. Larsen 2013 awareness.communication.coordina

一窩小鳥

Fractured Response: Lessons for WMD Consequence Management from Hurricane Katrina and the 1995 Tokyo prepared, to state the obvious.”. This was then-Senator Joe Biden commenting on the US response to Hurricane Katrina. He was not alone in his conclusion. Hurricane Katrina tested our national plans for responding to catastrophic events, including the threat of an attack on an American city involvin

decode

Consequence Management and National Securityarship. Much of the existing scholarship and literature devoted to consequence management has addressed it largely in terms of the policies, actions, and considerations necessary to prepare for, and respond to, a catastrophic event. This chapter, however, looks at consequence management from the per

階層

2945-7130 ent of consequence management. These include the roles, responsibilities, and coordination requirements of first responders, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Defense, and the military.978-1-137-33641-5978-1-137-33643-9Series ISSN 2945-7130 Series E-ISSN 2945-7149

Lipoma

Terror on the Tokyo Subway: Aum Shinrikyo and WMD Consequence Managementgasping on the ground, some of them with blood gushing from their nose or mouth. Army troops from a chemical warfare unit rushed to the scene with special vehicles to clean the air and men in gas masks and clothes resembling space suits, probed for clues.”

卡死偷電

What Just Happened? Situational Awareness, Threat Characterization, and Effective Consequence Manage government officials must also plan for more mundane events that can significantly disrupt the important daily activities of civil society. For instance, a hazardous materials incident that shuts down important transportation networks could paralyze a major city for several days.

Retrieval

Ventilator

Fractured Response: Lessons for WMD Consequence Management from Hurricane Katrina and the 1995 Tokyo shock of the 9/11 attacks, exposed a fundamental challenge to developing an effective national response system: the United States’ federal structure encourages cautious, fragmented, and reactionary responses, whereas catastrophes require bold, integrated, and proactive responses.

BINGE

只有

HATCH