Titlebook: Resource-Sensitivity, Binding and Anaphora; Geert-Jan M. Kruijff,Richard T. Oehrle Book 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003 communication

Herd-Immunity

健談

Harass

Resource-Sensitivity—A Brief Guideg on these differences brings to the fore essential differences. After examining the properties of resource-sensitivity in some detail in the next section, we consider some exemplary systems of binding and anaphora that have suggested themselves as theoretical models for the analysis of referential

異端邪說2

遵循的規(guī)范

頑固

不適當

GRACE

FLAGR

Resource Sharing in Type Logical GrammarCategorial Grammars are generally resource conscious formal systems. They describe how linguistic signs can be combined and transformed, but linguistic material is usually neither multiplied nor destroyed under categorial analyses. In other words, Categorial Grammars avoid counterparts of copy transformations and deletion rules.

BLANK

Structural Communication in BindingModeling grammatical composition as a form of resource-sensitive labeled deduction brings into prominence several parameters: