Titlebook: Research in History and Philosophy of Mathematics; The CSHPM 2017 Annua Maria Zack,Dirk Schlimm Conference proceedings 2018 Springer Intern

司法權(quán)

書目名稱Research in History and Philosophy of Mathematics影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Research in History and Philosophy of Mathematics影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Research in History and Philosophy of Mathematics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Research in History and Philosophy of Mathematics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Research in History and Philosophy of Mathematics被引頻次




書目名稱Research in History and Philosophy of Mathematics被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Research in History and Philosophy of Mathematics年度引用




書目名稱Research in History and Philosophy of Mathematics年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Research in History and Philosophy of Mathematics讀者反饋




書目名稱Research in History and Philosophy of Mathematics讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

correspondent

John Marsh and the Curious World of Decimal Arithmetic,ion. The most comprehensive exploration of these arithmetical techniques was undertaken by John Marsh in his . of 1742. In this paper we explain Marsh’s achievement, locate his contribution in the context of earlier work, and consider his audience and its implications as evidence for the depth and spread of interest in mathematics in England

BOLUS

萬神殿

加花粗鄙人

,Euler’s Work on the Surface Area of Scalene Cones,ay be defined. Although the curves seem naturally to involve transcendental quantities, he showed how to adjust so only algebraic quantities are needed. Some details of Euler’s solution for the scalene cones are presented here.

Oscillate

ARCHE

,Takeuti’s Well-Ordering Proof: Finitistically Fine?, proofs. The rest of the paper is dedicated to investigating the finitistic acceptability of Takeuti’s proof, including a small but important fix to that proof. That discussion strongly suggests that there is a philosophically interesting finitist standpoint that Takeuti’s proof, and therefore Gentzen’s proof, conforms to.

Irrigate

Mathematical Problem Choice and the Contact of Minds,ontact of minds. I examine two exceptional cases which fail to be explained by intrinsic constraints on motivation and posit how this contact could influence usual cases. While not the only constraint or drive in problem choice, establishing contact of minds plays an important role worth further examination.

violate

,Euler’s Discovery and Resolution of D’Alembert’s Paradox,ke air and water, and he uses Robins’ experiments with musket balls to explain this anomaly as a consequence of greater fluid pressure fore of the body than aft of it, due to a corresponding fore–aft asymmetry in the density of the fluid. Essentially, he resolves the apparent paradox by removing the assumption of the fluid’s incompressibility.

sulcus