Titlebook: Representations of Indian Muslims in British Colonial Discourse; Alex Padamsee Book 2005 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publi

delusion

Identification and Disavowal in Colonial Representationsrated by Edward Said’s . But it is necessary to go further than merely confirming the ‘production’ of Eastern subjects for a Western Metropolitan audience as a process of identity-formation dependent on a discourse of ‘Otherness’1 (available here, for instance, in a reading of ‘Mahommedanism’ in . a

Classify

BUDGE

The Historiography of Muslim ‘Conspiracy’lims during the traumatic events of 1857–59. These representations will be examined in detail, first through the correspondence of Alfred Lyall (1835–1911), and then through a comparison of those writings with other ICS official accounts. Before proceeding to that discussion, however, the following

自制

Alfred Lyall: A Writer of the Known and the Knowabley that Lyall’s perception of the question of Muslim ‘conspiracy’ during the events of 1857–59 was a typical product of his generation of ICS officers. But that the development from the intemperate language of the besieged young official of the correspondence to the judicious prose of the senior elde

Supplement

Verify

ABYSS

Some Preliminary Conclusionse import of the destabilisation of the category ‘Christian’. In contrast to the lack of reciprocity seen in the disinclination shown by Lyall’s ‘Hindoo’ to engage with the colonialist demand for recognition, one potential consequence of this destabilisation is the suggestion of ‘indigenisation’ that

Pseudoephedrine

Sorting the Inside from the Outsideept of ‘the stranger’, a figure that challenges the legislating powers precisely in their constitutive function to construct boundaries within and around social knowledges and formations. Bauman’s reflections on the ordering and classificatory imperatives of the modern polities that produce these ph

Tractable

‘A Wild and Ardent Faith’: Testing Oppositions in the Post-‘Mutiny’ Discoursehis figure was, for the British writer, to risk the dissolution of a highly unstable official colonialist identity; and yet in 1857 he had become its most important point of reference. As I will now discuss with reference to the later published writings of Alfred Lyall, W W Hunter’s . (1871), and th

INCUR

Conclusionhas attempted to provide a more coherent and nuanced account for the consolidation in colonialist discourse by the early twentieth century of essentialised descriptions of Indo-Muslim antagonism towards the British Indian state, and of their irremediable isolation on the outer margins of Indian soci