Titlebook: Representation and Derivation in the Theory of Grammar; Hubert Haider,Klaus Netter Book 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 199

Collar

Exposure

An Argument for Movement, version of the Government Binding Theory, e.g., in (.), but denied in (.)). It will identify a distinguishing property of movement rules not taken into account so far: the capability of creating scope.

無動于衷

Barriers and the Theory of Binding,t, three major approaches may be distinguished within this research programme: while the theories developed by (.), ., . and (.) express generalizations about local domains in terms of quasi-geometric properties of tree configurations and directionality of government, local domains are fixed in term

赦免

Charade

0924-4670 tual as well as to an empirical issue. Transformational grammar was in its outset (Chomsky 1957, 1975) a derivational theory which characterized a well-formed sentence by its derivation, i.e. a set of syntactic representations defined by a set of rules that map one representation into another. The s

Defiance

我沒有命令

scrutiny

NP-Movement and Expletive Chains, of B. (We could then say that A fills the position B at D-structure.) Only if such a configuration is found, can one go on to discuss whether the conditions constituting it must be implemented as conditions on derivation rather than conditions on representation..

companion

Barriers and the Theory of Binding,s of specific properties of subtrees in the two approaches implicit in the Barriers-framework, viz. the status of L-marking of a given category (cf. .), and extensions of a relativized concept of minimality (cf. ., ., .).

裁決