Titlebook: Religious Language; Michael Scott Book 2013 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2013 discourse.language.philoso

不能平庸

書目名稱Religious Language影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Religious Language影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Religious Language網絡公開度




書目名稱Religious Language網絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Religious Language被引頻次




書目名稱Religious Language被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Religious Language年度引用




書目名稱Religious Language年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Religious Language讀者反饋




書目名稱Religious Language讀者反饋學科排名

ARM

造反,叛亂

multiply

護航艦

Overview: An original and accessible discussion of the nature of religious language that draws on the latest research in the philosophy of language. The historical background to research on religious language is also explored and connections are made with both Continental Philosophy and Theology.978-1-349-44138-9978-1-137-03320-8

細查

ReferenceIn the discussion of apophatic theology in Chapter 2, we saw that a serious objection could be raised against the theory on the basis of two assumptions:

Postulate

Religious Internalismng argument available in favour of either of the two principal kinds of attitude theory, expressivism and moderate attitude theory. This is the argument from the motivational force of religious belief. As we will see, it is related to an argument sketched by Berkeley on the motivational effects of faith that we considered in Chapter 3.

Charade

Metaphor and Analogyain theories (two of which, John Searle’s implicature theory and Max Black’s interaction theory, are closely connected). As we will see in the later evaluation of IT, one of the most serious objections to the theory is that there does not seem to be a plausible theory of metaphor available on which IT can be defended.

Myocyte

expository