Titlebook: Reliability is a New Science; Gnedenko Was Right Paolo Rocchi Book 2017 Springer International Publishing AG 2017 Foundations of the reliab

babble

Jargon

n, then they each pick out the same object twice and assert its self-identity. This is a puzzle, because while (1) is clearly true and trivial, (2) an interesting fact of astronomy. They have, in Frege’s terminology, different cognitive value or significance.

焦慮

AORTA

hysterectomy

http://image.papertrans.cn/r/image/826406.jpg

殖民地

領(lǐng)帶

How Systems Break DownWe intend to formulate a principle-based theory through implications of this kind

懶洋洋

BLUSH

Adulate

When the Premises Are UntrueIn the previous pages we have reasoned under the assumption that the premises were true, but this is not enough. One cannot accept the “one size fits all” approach.