Titlebook: Relativistic Electrodynamics and Differential Geometry; Stephen Parrott Book 1987 Springer Science+Business Media New York 1987 derivation

CLIP

書目名稱Relativistic Electrodynamics and Differential Geometry影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Relativistic Electrodynamics and Differential Geometry影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Relativistic Electrodynamics and Differential Geometry網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Relativistic Electrodynamics and Differential Geometry網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Relativistic Electrodynamics and Differential Geometry被引頻次




書目名稱Relativistic Electrodynamics and Differential Geometry被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Relativistic Electrodynamics and Differential Geometry年度引用




書目名稱Relativistic Electrodynamics and Differential Geometry年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Relativistic Electrodynamics and Differential Geometry讀者反饋




書目名稱Relativistic Electrodynamics and Differential Geometry讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

有法律效應(yīng)

Mathematical Tools, is well-versed in differential geometry need only skim it to absorb the notation, while one whose knowledge stems from a half-remembered course taken years ago will probably need to read it more carefully. Few proofs are given, but most of the omitted arguments are trivial or routine; those which a

松果

Further Difficulties and Alternate Approaches,h logically consistent and in agreement with experiment. The previous chapters presented the most widely accepted viewpoint, which culminates in the Lorentz-Dirac equation. There are many motivations and “derivations” of this equation, and the one presented in Chapter 4 is the one which I find most

兩棲動物

critic

n in the language and spirit of coordinate-free differential geometry. The intended audience is primarily mathematicians who want a bare-bones account of the foundations of electrodynamics written in language with which they are familiar and secondarily physicists who may be curious how their old fr

Stagger

Mathematical Tools, years ago will probably need to read it more carefully. Few proofs are given, but most of the omitted arguments are trivial or routine; those which are not are clearly flagged. The ability to fill the gaps, or at least sense how the proofs might go, could be taken as a test as to whether the reader has the background for Chapters 3 and 4.

按等級

Further Difficulties and Alternate Approaches,nearly rigorous and convincing. I tried to present the best possible case for the Lorentz-Dirac theory, but it is easy to see why many have serious doubts about that equation. (Others believe it is absolutely fundamental.)

有毛就脫毛

Relativistic Electrodynamics and Differential Geometry

美食家

Relativistic Electrodynamics and Differential Geometry978-1-4612-4684-8

規(guī)范要多

Book 1987sts are surprised to learn that the correct equation to describe the motion of a classical charged particle is still a matter of some controversy. The most mentioned candidate is the Lorentz-Dirac equation t . However, it is experimentally unverified, is known to have no physically reasonable soluti