Titlebook: Regulating Data Monopolies; A Law and Economics Jingyuan Ma Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive lic

修改

Defining the Relevant Market for Data Monopoly,analysing data-driven online markets. There are arguments to support avoiding defining a relevant market and focusing on the anti-competitive effects of the particular business conduct. There are also discussions on how new economic methods could be developed to replace SSNIP when defining a relevan

正論

invade

Market Power Assessment in Online Markets,es when manufacturers have the ability to raise product prices above equilibrium prices. However, in the data monopoly market, the monopoly power of the manufacturer is not shown in the “price increase”, because the goods and services provided are “free”, and the market power may be reflected in the

Unsaturated-Fat

collateral

motivate

Conclusions, views on whether and how data monopolies should be regulated. There are strong arguments for and against governmental intervention, while there are also strong opponents to ask for the divestiture of data giants. When online platforms do not compete for lower costs but to attract attention from con

強制令

ta economy.Proposes what specific explanations and improveme.This book analyzes the business model of enterprises in the digital economy by taking an economic and comparative perspective. The aim of this book is to conduct an in-depth analysis of the anti-competitive behavior of companies who monopo

Blood-Vessels

Admire

Market Power Assessment in Online Markets,ficant limitations. This chapter is the judgment of data monopoly enterprises abusing their dominant position in the relevant market, including the formation of the dominant market position by companies monopolizing data, the characteristics of the abuse of market dominance, and the case study of Facebook and Google in the US and EU.

Antagonism